Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr
#5

Arran;

Before the advent of the superhet design, there were lots of tuned radio frequency radios (TRF). Those had multiple RF amplifiers, each with its own tuned circuitry in order to have adequate selectivity. Selectivity is more of an issue when tuning a weak station next to a strong station. The selectivity helps to keep the strong station from wiping out the weak signal station. Philco had some high end radios in the middle to late 1930s that even had IF circuits with adjustable selectivity. RF sensitivity is more of an issue on shortwave bands, especially the higher frequencies. On the AM broadcast band not much sensitivity is really needed. I have a Hallicrafters SX-25 which has two 6SK7 RF amplifier circuits. On the AM broadcast band one RF amplifier stage is not used. A 4-gang tuning capacitor is used along with a 4-gang fine tuning capacitor. It has two IF amplifier stages with switchable extra coils in the IF transformers plus a crystal filter for CW and voice only reception. It does do a better job of receiving shortwave stations than the Philco 40-201, but then it is not a broad-band radio with the best audio frequency response. The 40-201 has limited use on shortwave bands as its tuning is coarse and very touchy on the highest shortwave band.

It is interesting to see the variations in design offered by various companies during the 1930s and 1940s. A significant number of people were keeping up with foreign news due to events leading up to WWII. After WWII interest in shortwave broadcasting dropped off. Consequently the number of sets offering shortwave reception declined.

Joe


Messages In This Thread
RE: 41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr - by Joeztech - 10-21-2016, 07:24 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Today I finished inspecting all the parts. The result is not very pleasing. The first positive news: 1) The power tr...Vlad95 — 11:40 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, found muh culprit. After using socket test adapters and finding voltages all ok, swapping 6V6s, no avail, swapped ...TV MAN — 11:18 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>