Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr
#7

Sarnoff et al were very effective in suppressing the adoption of FM; so much so that it wasn't until the 1970s that FM really started to take off nationwide here in the US. Up until then, FM was mostly the home of easy listening "beautiful" music and classical music.

My parents had a large Sears Silvertone AM-FM table model radio when I was a kid in Kansas City; I do not remember the model number. I do recall switching it over to FM as a child and finding KFMU 94.9 ("FM 95", they called themselves), and only a few other, weaker stations. As I recall, the stations I found were either beautiful/mood music (KFMU) or classical. I didn't leave it on there long - I switched back to AM and WHB, then KC's leading rocker.

Yes, there were a few FM radio stations here and there which began programming popular music, "progressive" rock, etc. in the late 1960s, but it wasn't until the 1970s that popular music, country music, etc. began a mass migration from AM to FM and never looked back. Unfortunately, when rock and country took over the FM band, classical and easy listening/mood music died out on the band for the most part.

I know KFMU switched call letters to KCEZ in the 1970s, and are now KCMO-FM, their original call letters, playing classic hits, I believe. KCMike could confirm if he sees this thread.

Armstrong would be pleased to know that his FM system finally won out, but it took far too long to do so. Were it not for the negative campaign against FM run by Sarnoff and his minions, FM probably would have been accepted much earlier. And who knows what might have happened to AM?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
RE: 41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr - by Ron Ramirez - 10-23-2016, 08:05 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Today I finished inspecting all the parts. The result is not very pleasing. The first positive news: 1) The power tr...Vlad95 — 11:40 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, found muh culprit. After using socket test adapters and finding voltages all ok, swapping 6V6s, no avail, swapped ...TV MAN — 11:18 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 670 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 669 Guest(s)
Avatar

>