Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L
#54

I guess I should quit being annoyance on the phorum and get back to the 660. Got the sm back together and working. Had to modify the coil coil cover a little to accommodate new terminals. After doing some minor repairs it was ready to go back into the cabinet.

SO unless your Atlas the cabinet has to be placed on the floor w/ the outside back facing the floor. Trying to lift and hold the chassis vertically while installing the long mounting screws in difficult. Got it in and bolted up and the same w/the spkr. Plays swell!!!! Sounds good.

Only one problem can't see the sm. You see there two sets of screw holes that would accommodate sm, guess which ones I picked  [Image: http://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smi...edface.gif]   Not sure if I can get in there without removing the spkr and chassis, but I think I know the answer  [Image: http://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smi...on_mad.gif]

It's been playing for a hour or so picking up my little converter (converts audio to rf signal) which receives it's audio signal  from the net.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry


Messages In This Thread
Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 07:09 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:27 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-18-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-19-2016, 12:49 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 03:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-19-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 04:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 08:50 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 11:47 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 06:30 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 03:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 01:25 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-24-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 03:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 09:50 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-25-2016, 10:36 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 07:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-26-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-30-2016, 02:01 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-03-2016, 10:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 05:20 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 11:31 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Arran - 07-08-2016, 03:47 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-08-2016, 08:35 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 07-08-2016, 04:05 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 11:28 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 07-11-2016, 11:43 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 12:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 06:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 07-20-2016, 08:26 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 09:40 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 10:04 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 10:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 07:39 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 07:22 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 11-28-2016, 09:24 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 09:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 11-29-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 04:12 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 09:17 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 11:24 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 12:46 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 06:48 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 10:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-02-2016, 11:02 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by klondike98 - 12-02-2016, 11:30 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 03:32 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 12-03-2016, 03:53 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 04:51 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 09:26 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1037 online users. [Complete List]
» 5 Member(s) | 1032 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar
Avatar

>