Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L

Radioroslyn
Phorum Expert

Posts: 7,305
Threads: 270
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa

#55

12-01-2016, 09:07 PM

(06-18-2016, 08:36 PM)Nathan Slingerland Wrote: Awesome radio! Looks like you'll have lots of fun.

Yeah I had soooo much fun I could hardly stand it!!!!! [Image: http://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smi..._crazy.gif]

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Thread Closed

Messages In This Thread

Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 07:09 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:27 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-18-2016, 08:33 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:45 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Nathan Slingerland - 06-18-2016, 08:36 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 09:07 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-19-2016, 12:49 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 03:52 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-19-2016, 04:11 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 04:54 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 08:50 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 11:47 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 06:30 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 03:45 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 02:44 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 06:56 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 01:25 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-24-2016, 02:54 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 03:44 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 09:50 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-25-2016, 10:36 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 01:34 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 07:41 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-26-2016, 08:33 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-30-2016, 02:01 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-03-2016, 10:00 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 05:20 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 11:31 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Arran - 07-08-2016, 03:47 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-08-2016, 08:35 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Kenneth F. Besso Jr. - 07-08-2016, 03:31 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 07-08-2016, 04:05 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 11:28 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 07-11-2016, 11:43 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 12:10 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 06:07 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 07-20-2016, 08:26 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 09:40 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 10:04 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 10:52 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 05:16 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 07:39 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 07:22 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 11-28-2016, 09:24 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 09:56 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 11-29-2016, 02:28 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Nathan Slingerland - 11-29-2016, 02:50 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 04:12 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 09:17 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 11:24 AM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Nathan Slingerland - 11-30-2016, 12:14 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 12:46 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Nathan Slingerland - 11-30-2016, 01:43 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 03:41 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 06:48 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Nathan Slingerland - 12-01-2016, 09:31 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 10:10 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-02-2016, 11:02 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by klondike98 - 12-02-2016, 11:30 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 03:32 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 12-03-2016, 03:53 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 04:51 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 05:00 PM

RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 09:26 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

Who's Online

There are currently 983 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 980 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me