Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Fisher 400 Receiver
#8

(06-23-2017, 01:31 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  Those brown slide switches break a lot more often than the regular black ones. Replacements go for a premium on Pay-Bay.

Yes indeed. I consider myself very fortunate to have that 175-T junker chassis. Icon_smile As I see it, it finally proved to be good for something.

You know, if I had to do it over again, I might have tried what Arran suggested. It was probably more work to add those push-on terminals to the 400's wiring than it would have been to switch (no pun intended) the terminal boards, or to put the 175-T switch sliders into the 400 switches. That is, assuming the sliders and actuators were compatible with one another. I've seen two different types of Fisher actuators and they are not compatible with one another.

(06-23-2017, 01:31 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  DO NOT plug in any of the Russian replacements. They will ruin the sockets.

Russ is absolutely right. The pins of the new Electro-Harmonix 7868 tubes are larger than the originals. Once you get them in (and from what I have read, they will go in but it isn't easy the first time due to the larger pins), you are then forever limited to using E-H 7868 tubes in those sockets.

OTOH, if you want new 7868 tubes, you are pretty much limited to using the Electro-Harmonix tubes unless you can stumble across a set of NOS American made 7868s.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-03-2017, 08:51 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-03-2017, 08:57 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-03-2017, 08:59 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-03-2017, 09:04 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Arran - 06-23-2017, 03:21 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-23-2017, 10:34 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Phlogiston - 06-23-2017, 01:31 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-23-2017, 05:43 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 06-23-2017, 05:55 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Arran - 06-29-2017, 06:43 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Phlogiston - 06-29-2017, 09:07 PM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Arran - 07-02-2017, 02:34 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Phlogiston - 07-02-2017, 10:03 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Arran - 07-03-2017, 04:38 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Ron Ramirez - 07-03-2017, 07:32 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Phlogiston - 07-03-2017, 11:02 AM
RE: The Fisher 400 Receiver - by Paul Philco322 - 07-16-2017, 11:05 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 16B Parts
I think the chassis is painted.morzh — 08:13 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
Honestrly, the original is quite acceptable and, it seems to me, can be cleaned.morzh — 08:11 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Mondial left a thread about remanufacturing thois type coupler.morzh — 08:09 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Are you talking about rewinding or rewiring? For rewiring, meaning runnin wires to the coil from other components, the ...morzh — 08:08 PM
12' Philco
I wonder who would be able to "no stoop" with this one.morzh — 08:05 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Hello PHORUM members, I am still working on restoration of my PHILCO 37-640.  I want to start with rewiring the IF ca...georgetownjohn — 06:32 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
I am working on a Philco 41-608 with the gear-driven changer.  The coupling (#35-2220) between the motor assembly and th...alangard — 06:29 PM
Gilfillan Brothers Car Radio?
There is a Mission Bell model 19/19A that could be what you’re looking for, Riders vol 4. It has the tube line-up of: 0Z...Joe Rossi — 05:01 PM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Definitely 870044RossH — 01:12 PM
12' Philco
Wonder if the chassis was big too.daveone23 — 12:38 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1646 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 1642 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>