Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco or not Philco ?
#14

Good morning Ron , Morzh and All

Thanks a lot for answers and documentation .

For Ron : on the illustration , I read " model 264 " baby Grand " , why do you tell 265 ???

It appears the page model is existing in radiomuseum site , but without any photo ... so it was impossible to make relation !
Radiomuseum presents two models , one from UK and one from The States .

I ' ll ask my friend to verify if the tubes set is OK with the page model , except the left tube as, as said Ron , which was at evidence replaced .


Messages In This Thread
Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-05-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-05-2017, 02:22 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-05-2017, 02:30 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-05-2017, 02:41 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-05-2017, 03:21 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-05-2017, 03:52 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by WallaceRoger - 07-05-2017, 04:16 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-05-2017, 04:27 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-05-2017, 04:39 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by Radioroslyn - 07-05-2017, 05:23 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by Phlogiston - 07-05-2017, 06:08 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-05-2017, 06:43 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by Ron Ramirez - 07-05-2017, 07:17 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-06-2017, 09:27 AM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-06-2017, 10:00 AM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by Ron Ramirez - 07-06-2017, 12:24 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-06-2017, 01:15 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by Ron Ramirez - 07-06-2017, 01:40 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-06-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-06-2017, 03:21 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by claude.france - 07-06-2017, 05:28 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by morzh - 07-06-2017, 06:10 PM
RE: Philco or not Philco ? - by sam - 07-06-2017, 07:17 PM



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Model 28L
For 28 you will probably need to buy a Hammond 125CSE. Or any of the series of the power you need, with SE suffix. Then ...morzh — 02:09 PM
37-60 revision 6
I am restoring a Philco 37-60 and it shows run 6 they removed the ground from G3 of the 6K7G and put the G3 to -2.5v for...bobbyd1200 — 01:01 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Mike is correct on the bulb connection, two separate circuits. I found that by rotating the bulb and sliding it forward ...RodB — 12:19 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Cleaned ann contacts, switches and sockets, works great now.martinj — 11:32 AM
Model 28L
Hello, I'm restoring a Philco 28L and the output transformer is open. Part number of the transformer is 32-7020. Can...HORSTE — 10:32 AM
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
I read about a kit to convert the variable speed changer in the Philco 42-1008 into a single speed unit.  That would rem...alangard — 09:30 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim Well...a chassis is metal. Magnetic or not, it does not matter. A transformer has some hum to it. It is natural. Th...morzh — 08:40 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I thought the 83 tube was bad because it looked white but it tests strong. Blue gassy though. I checked the fuse, it was...martinj — 08:37 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Ross I am not sure what current limiting effect the incandescent provides. They are two different parts of the sch...morzh — 08:31 PM
12' Philco
Bob Thanks for that photo. I have been looking for it, and I cannot find anythinmg on the web. I forgot it was here...morzh — 08:29 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6031 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 6029 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>