Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 90: expecting too much?
#4

Yes - 1000 ohms/volt was the standard for many years. 20K ohms/volt is much better, and the modern DMMs are in the 1 meg/volt or better range.

If your line voltage is 117, you're lucky - and your radios will like that. Most of us in the States have line voltages in the neighborhood of 125 volts. I once measured close to 130 when I was living in Evansville. Higher line voltages will also translate into higher voltages in your set.

284V on the RF tube plate is not surprising. When I was working on my Model 370 last year, I measured 280 volts on its RF, 1st detector and IF tube plates. Philco specs call for 250V on the plates of those tubes. As for the cathodes, I measured 3V on the RF, oscillator and IF cathodes; 7V on the 1st detector (mixer) tube. The front end of the 70 is the same as the early 90 front end. I was using chassis ground as common.

But 247V on the detector plate? That does sound quite high! Have you checked resistors (23) and (34)? Both 250K, 1/2 watt. And what about the 2nd detector cathode resistor (21)? 50K, 1/2 watt. If these check OK, then check your B-C resistor (38).

Try measuring again, using B- as your common point, and see what the difference is. You will probably read close to published specs on the cathodes by doing this.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-05-2010, 01:28 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-05-2010, 08:41 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Ron Ramirez - 02-05-2010, 10:57 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-06-2010, 11:34 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by exray - 02-07-2010, 09:48 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 04:01 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 04:19 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 05:07 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by codefox1 - 02-07-2010, 05:45 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-08-2010, 12:27 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-08-2010, 08:59 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by codefox1 - 02-09-2010, 06:31 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hi John, I don't have this radio, but I can supply some info: Based on your pic, pins 7,8 and 1 are used together, go...MrFixr55 — 02:02 PM
New Philco Repair Bench
As far as I know, the Repairbench does not work, and has not been working in a while. Chuck (we had that campaign looki...morzh — 01:33 PM
Radio city products 664 schematic request
Need a schematic or manual for the 664. The 663 may be similar.daveone23 — 12:38 PM
New Philco Repair Bench
Thanks Gary.dconant — 12:16 PM
New Philco Repair Bench
I tried accessing the site through our library and got the same response. It's reported to our tech gurus. GaryGarySP — 11:50 AM
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>