Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A Jackson Bell model ????
#4

I agree with Russ, it looks like one of those radios turned out by one of the Chicago independent companies with the meaningless brass plates nailed to the front, Continental R & T used to build such sets, and so did Belmont, the speaker at least was made by Quam-Nichols, that may help narrow it down. The real Jackson-Bell went bankrupt as Russ mentioned, then one of the co-founders found a new business partner and founded Packard Bell. The really cheap sets were manufactured by the infamous "Plant A" which some claim was actually a company called "Clinton", but I think that they came along later. I don't wish to come off as offensive but the refinishing jobs someone performed on that set is poor, all monotone, no grain filler, rough looking, and to make matters worse they sanded the grain every which way, then there is that grill cloth. I noticed one odd feature though, the two escutcheon plates behind the knobs are not centered with the controls, I wonder if someone mixed and matched chassis and cabinet, or added those plates to dress up a cabinet that didn't originally have them? Noticed that one plate has a 0-100 scale like a a 1920s radio, but why when it has a nice airplane dial in the center?
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 09-19-2017, 09:51 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Phlogiston - 09-19-2017, 10:07 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by morzh - 09-19-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Arran - 09-19-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 09-19-2017, 11:24 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 09-19-2017, 11:30 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by OldRestorer - 09-20-2017, 09:00 AM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 09-20-2017, 09:52 AM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by morzh - 09-20-2017, 11:30 AM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 09-20-2017, 06:15 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by WallaceRoger - 09-21-2017, 12:59 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by kc5gym - 09-21-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by OldRestorer - 09-22-2017, 10:24 AM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Scott D - 11-30-2017, 05:38 PM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by Arran - 12-01-2017, 12:22 AM
RE: A Jackson Bell model ???? - by palegreenthumb - 12-02-2017, 01:55 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>