Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 55F
#6

I would not worry about the values of the filter caps, the originals were all paper and of low values compared to electrolytics, the difference in output voltage will be negligible, if there is any difference. I'm not sure about the 55 and 55F chassis but it may also have a choke input off the rectifier tube rather then a cap, if this is the case then the size of the input cap would never be an issue. Also most of these early radios used a series of filter chokes to filter the ripple out rather then relying on the capacitors, since large paper caps were bulky and expensive. After wet electrolytics came out the capacity of filter caps went from 1.5 to 2 uf to 8 uf to 12 uf, so the cost of large value capacitors went down, and so they could reduce the size and number of filter chokes they used, usually reduced down the field coil in the speaker.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-15-2017, 12:10 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by morzh - 12-15-2017, 01:02 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-15-2017, 02:26 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Radioroslyn - 12-15-2017, 03:00 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-15-2017, 04:01 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Arran - 12-16-2017, 04:43 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-16-2017, 09:42 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Radioroslyn - 12-16-2017, 11:43 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by tbone - 12-16-2017, 01:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-17-2017, 12:26 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-17-2017, 12:32 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Arran - 12-17-2017, 03:10 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by tbone - 12-17-2017, 06:20 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-17-2017, 11:54 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-24-2017, 12:14 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Radioroslyn - 12-24-2017, 02:39 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-25-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-26-2017, 11:03 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by Radioroslyn - 12-26-2017, 02:59 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 12-26-2017, 04:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 11-09-2020, 08:52 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by rfeenstra - 11-11-2020, 05:11 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 55F - by klondike98 - 11-12-2020, 11:35 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
PT-6 antenna connections
Hi Bridcarl +1 on the others.  Pin 6 of the 7C6 is the AVC Diode so it is appropriate that that pin 4 of the coil con...MrFixr55 — 07:30 AM
462ron
Joseph, this is beyond awesome. A lot of thought and engineering went into this and you hit a home run! Now I must save ...462ron — 07:27 AM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
Outstanding work indeed. I wish I could come up with solutions like this.slford310 — 11:16 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
The abilities of our 'Phorum Pholks" never ceases to amaze me! Fantastic fabrication, Joseph! I'm waiting now for...GarySP — 08:27 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
Thanks. I never realized that was a notch noted in the schematic as described. I’ll recheck my wiring.bridkarl — 08:13 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
Thank you! I was quite new to the Phorum when I started this post, so I feel like it might be advantageous to publish a ...jrblasde — 08:07 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
Notice in the schematic the notch at the bottom of the antenna coil is between pins 3 & 4. Yes, pin 6 of the 7C6 is...RodB — 07:34 PM
bridkarl
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>