Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-650 Issues
#3

Hi- Thanks for the reply. The data I'm using is the Model 37-650 Service Bulliten, No. 254, from Philco. On the front page it gives voltages in Figure 1, with each socket referenced as to pin location and voltages. Most are just given as "100V" or "250V" and only the 6.3V positions are marked as AC. Is it possible I'm doing the wrong test? Should the higher readings be DC? and if so, would that account for the grossly higher readings? I have been using this chart as guide to checking voltages. I have the negative probe clipped directly to the chassis, near the power supply, and touch the tip of the red to the point indicated.

The paragraph under the test point chart states: "The voltages indicated by arrows were measured with a Philco 025 Circuit Tester which contains a voltmeter having a resistance of 1000 ohms per volt. Volume control at minimum, range switch in broadcast position, line voltage 115 A.C." My meter, in AC has 1000 ohms per volt sensitivity, and in DC has 20,000 ohms per volt sensitivity. (I have a 0-6000V ability)

As to the wiring, I replaced each wire one at a time- and referred greatly to the schematic- I have one of the large ones from Chuck S. laminated and clipped up in front of me.(I must say- sometimes takes a bit of figuring to reconcile reality with the schematic sometimes)

Let me know if I'm testing the power in the wrong way, or need a different probe- Right now I'm using a simple straight probe.

(Once I figure out these fancy toys- the ossy, the rf gen, I'll be set... lol)

Thanks!
Scott

Old Cars, Old Radios, Old Pipes and Young Women... What more is there?


Messages In This Thread
37-650 Issues - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 07:06 AM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-27-2006, 08:01 AM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 12:07 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-27-2006, 12:21 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 12:32 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 06:02 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-27-2006, 06:23 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 06:29 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-27-2006, 06:38 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 06:41 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 06:51 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-27-2006, 07:05 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 07:44 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-27-2006, 09:07 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-30-2006, 05:12 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 01-30-2006, 07:53 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-30-2006, 07:59 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-30-2006, 08:02 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 01-30-2006, 08:12 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-31-2006, 12:52 AM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 01-31-2006, 09:57 AM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-31-2006, 11:43 AM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 01-31-2006, 06:40 PM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 01-31-2006, 08:53 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-02-2006, 09:24 AM
[No subject] - by Steve Chambers - 02-02-2006, 05:00 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 02-02-2006, 05:47 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-02-2006, 06:24 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 02-02-2006, 07:42 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-02-2006, 07:43 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-02-2006, 08:36 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 02-02-2006, 10:22 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-02-2006, 11:03 PM
[No subject] - by Bill Hutchinson - 02-03-2006, 03:20 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-03-2006, 03:26 PM
[No subject] - by Bill Hutchinson - 02-03-2006, 07:08 PM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-04-2006, 08:29 AM
[No subject] - by Robbie Roberts - 02-05-2006, 01:42 AM
[No subject] - by 49Stude63 - 02-05-2006, 11:07 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 249 made in England
Thanks for the information MrFixr55.   It's tube amplification and not solid state. TOMfklown — 11:27 AM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Well, I’ll be! I learned something.jrblasde — 11:03 AM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Yes, Garrard was well-regarded for its standalones.morzh — 10:48 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Quite the interesting stories, sir! Somewhat reminds me of my first job out of school (not that I worked in a similar fi...jrblasde — 09:33 AM
Philco model 40-100
Arran, I restored 2 Canadian battery-crank telephones for a friend a while ago, a Northern Electric (Canadian version of...MrFixr55 — 08:04 AM
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Beautiful work, a 79 year old radio brought back to life. The first FM radios for me, a little iffy, had some I just cou...Jimradio — 08:01 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I was a field engineer for a biomedical company for many years. Many was the time that I was driving home from NYC in t...MrFixr55 — 06:40 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Don't laugh folks, I have not been above taking a chassis into the bathtub (when Ms. Fixr was out of the house), taping ...MrFixr55 — 06:02 AM
Philco model 40-100
Marion; By "newer style" carbon resistors do you mean the molded type with coloured bands rather then the BE...Arran — 01:00 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
hello jrblasde , your radio sounds great well done !! I bought like 20 years ago a Philco 610b that someone had painte...radiorich — 11:50 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>