Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nathan's 37-690X
#14

I have a question about the schematic from the 37-690 service bulletin (No. 267) and part 152.
Thats Part No. 30-2176, Electrolytic Condenser (8, 10 mfd).

   

When capacitors are drawn this way it usually means that the 'can' part is the negative and the 'stud' part is the positive.
I suspect the schematic is incorrect.

I believe that usually in this configuration the 10uF capacitor would have positive connected to ground., negative common with the other 8uF half of 152 and part 151 (another 8uF cap) all of which connects to the center-tap of the transformer.

Another datapoint is that according to the 1939 Parts Catalog 30-2176 is 'common negative' with leads.
   

(Side note: it is nice to know that the 10uF section is rated at only 10V. There was no way I could fit both 8uF and 10uF Solen caps into the same can!)


Messages In This Thread
Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:14 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:30 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:40 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Kenradio - 08-18-2018, 04:02 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 08:54 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 09:03 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by morzh - 08-18-2018, 10:00 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-19-2018, 01:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Arran - 08-19-2018, 01:52 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 08-21-2018, 11:39 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-21-2018, 10:09 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-21-2018, 10:52 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 08:09 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 09:17 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Ron Ramirez - 08-22-2018, 09:31 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 11:30 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Radioroslyn - 08-22-2018, 11:31 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 11:33 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-23-2018, 12:12 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-23-2018, 12:30 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 08-23-2018, 08:08 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-25-2018, 11:25 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Arran - 08-26-2018, 12:33 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Ron Ramirez - 08-26-2018, 07:59 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-08-2018, 09:10 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 09-08-2018, 11:00 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by GarySP - 09-08-2018, 11:40 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 11:42 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 11:56 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 04:43 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-12-2018, 09:52 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 09-12-2018, 10:35 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by thirtiesradio - 09-13-2018, 01:32 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 10:01 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 09-13-2018, 10:37 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 10:53 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Radioroslyn - 09-13-2018, 11:16 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 11:33 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-23-2018, 09:20 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 10-06-2018, 09:28 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 10-07-2018, 10:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 10-07-2018, 01:37 PM



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I tried accessing the site through our library and got the same response. It's reported to our tech gurus. GaryGarySP — 11:50 AM
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4581 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4580 Guest(s)
Avatar

>