Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Hippo differences
#7

It's not exactly a mid year change, the code numbers I mean. You see Philco used to design different versions of the same model chassis to accommodate whatever parts they could accumulate from the various suppliers they used. In the post war period there were a number of parts shortages, so some sets, like the Philco 46-1201, could have as many as eight different code numbers, and three or more production run versions, or the same set, swapping everything from tube lineups, to what shape speaker they used. They could swap back and forth between producing different Code numbered versions depending on what parts they could get and what they were running out of.
  I have three Hippo models, one good one, and two project ones, one is more of a parts set. The first one I got has a tuned RF amplifier stage,
and uses a 7A8 octode mixer oscillator, the other two have a 14AF7 twin triode mixer-oscillator, and two IF amplifier tubes. I can't tell you what year these were built because Philco Products of Canada Ltd. used two digit model numbers like the late 1920s and early 30s sets did, rather then a model year prefix like 41-, 46-, etc. But if the Toronto plant was swapping parts around like this you can bet that the U.S plants were.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Philco Hippo differences - by Kestas - 08-15-2018, 10:44 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by morzh - 08-15-2018, 10:45 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Ron Ramirez - 08-15-2018, 07:24 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by David - 08-15-2018, 07:27 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Squire - 08-29-2018, 09:07 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Arran - 09-14-2018, 03:56 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Squire - 09-16-2018, 06:58 PM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Today I finished inspecting all the parts. The result is not very pleasing. The first positive news: 1) The power tr...Vlad95 — 11:40 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, found muh culprit. After using socket test adapters and finding voltages all ok, swapping 6V6s, no avail, swapped ...TV MAN — 11:18 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 952 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 950 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>