Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RCA R39
#2

It's probably a "Victor" rather then an RCA is it was sold in the Canadian market. I believe that the R39 is one of the microsyncronous models, which debut for the 1929 model year, and were carried over until 1931, they have a funny arrangement with the tuning capacitors in order to allow them to be aligned to synchronize with the dial scale. The RF section is usually a series of #26 tubes as RF amplifiers, followed by a #27 detector, so not much different then an RCA Radiola 18 electrically, the audio amp and power supply is on the bottom chassis. In terms of value, well they are decent sets, not as good as a superhet, but with push pull #45s, electrodynamic speaker, and a heavy cabinet, they sound good. They are also fairly common, I think that Victor/RCA built something like 400,000 units over three years across all the models, so they are probably middle of the road in terms of value. At one time some guys had a scam of taking the power supply/amp chassis out, and pedaling them to Japanese audiophools as Western Electric amplifiers and speakers, so they used to be worth more because of that, until word got around the Orient that they were being swindled, now they are back down to where most late 1920s and early 30s consoles are. Be careful lifting these though, it's a two many job, the ones with a phonograph in top is a three man job.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
RCA R39 - by rfeenstra - 01-12-2019, 11:52 PM
RE: RCA R39 - by Arran - 01-13-2019, 02:11 AM
RE: RCA R39 - by rfeenstra - 01-13-2019, 08:53 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
After a couple of days worth of troubleshooting my signal generator, I gave up. The oscilloscope still worked fine, so I...jrblasde — 09:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Yes, I can confirm. I bought one (haven’t restored it yet) which didn’t have a back panel.jrblasde — 09:37 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Try a 39-116.Radioroslyn — 09:24 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
I remember Philco 45 being awkward. If I am not mistaking it for some other set. I think there is a phenolic board, or e...morzh — 08:49 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
If you want a radio that's difficult to work on, get a 37-620. The one side of the chassis is packed pretty tightly and ...Greg — 07:29 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>