Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 144 question
#2

Well, let's see...

Both the 44 and 144 used the same filter choke, Part No. 5930. 100 H, 10 mA, 2100 ohms DC resistance.

Options?

1. Find one in a junk 44 or 144. I'm not aware of any other Philco models that used that choke. Models 29 and 45 used a similar choke, Part No. 32-7018 (70 H, 10 mA, 2300 ohms DC resistance). This would probably work OK in the 44/144 circuit.
2. Use a substitute - Hammond makes chokes; none are exact replacements, but it appears HC-154E might be in the ballpark. The inductance in henrys is a lot lower then the original (20 H), but the DC resistance is close (1666 ohms). An increase in the value of the output filter capacitor (71) should take care of any increase in ripple.
3. Have Heyboer Transformer custom wind one for you.
4. Use a 2200 ohm resistor instead, increasing the size of the output filter (71) from 6 to 22 uF. The wattage of this resistor would need to be calculated.

I have a freshly refinished 144B cathedral cabinet, and a 44 chassis to put in it. The 44 will be converted to a 144 by changing a few components and adding a shadow meter. It is also missing its filter choke, and I'm thinking about going the resistor route. Philco used resistors instead of chokes in similar circuits in some of their 1937 models; the 37-650 comes to mind as an example.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 144 question - by TA Forbes - 12-09-2010, 10:43 AM
Re: Philco 144 question - by Ron Ramirez - 12-09-2010, 11:23 AM
Re: Philco 144 question - by Ron Ramirez - 12-09-2010, 11:36 AM
Re: Philco 144 question - by TA Forbes - 12-09-2010, 08:38 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by TA Forbes - 12-09-2010, 08:46 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by Ron Ramirez - 12-09-2010, 10:28 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by TA Forbes - 12-09-2010, 10:45 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by TA Forbes - 12-10-2010, 06:44 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by Chuck Schwark - 12-10-2010, 11:36 PM
Re: Philco 144 question - by Ron Ramirez - 12-11-2010, 08:00 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>