Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 48-1276
#3

Hi Greg

Congratulations, that was a great gift indeed! I think the 48-1276 is one of the best-looking Philco models ever made. I used to own a similar 48-1274; I wish I could have kept it, but when you have a fair-sized collection, eventually you reach a point where you have too many consoles and not enough room.

Anyway...the original changer used in the 48-1276 was the M-4, which is actually a 1946 changer. It is 78 rpm only. The main drawback of this changer is the "dynamic" cartridge used. The cartridge itself was a good one; the problem was the required stylus. It was designed to use a special stylus. The majority of these cartridges have been destroyed by people sticking a steel needle into this cartridge, because it looks like that is what it takes. It isn't. And once a steel needle is inserted, enlarging the opening in the cartridge for the stylus, the cartridge is permanently destroyed. Gib Epling at West-Tech tells me that they cannot be repaired once this has been done.

Philco must have decided the dynamic cartridge was a bad idea also, because a few years later they offered a kit to convert the changers using the "dynamic" cartridge to a crystal cartridge. I think it would be better to come up with a way to adapt a Stanton 500 cartridge to this tone arm.

If you want to play records, and play more than just 78 rpm records, a good replacement would be a three speed changer from an early 1950s Philco. You would have to be sure it would fit in the hole for the M-4, though. It might require using the motor board from the early 1950s Philco you get the changer from, or cutting another board to fit the changer.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 12-30-2010, 01:09 AM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by TA Forbes - 12-30-2010, 11:31 AM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-31-2010, 10:03 AM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 12-31-2010, 01:33 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by 7estatdef - 01-01-2011, 12:59 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 01-01-2011, 01:18 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 01-26-2011, 09:49 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-31-2011, 02:19 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 02-01-2011, 12:55 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by Glenn Roberts - 02-01-2011, 04:00 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 02-02-2011, 02:07 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by Art Hoch - 02-02-2011, 11:36 PM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by greg denney - 02-03-2011, 01:25 AM
Re: Philco 48-1276 - by Art Hoch - 02-03-2011, 01:02 PM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim, nice write up and thanks for sharing !! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:47 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, this was a real "Hum-Dinger" :lol: ! This will be kinda long, but hopefully it will help others having t...TV MAN — 01:55 AM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6301 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6300 Guest(s)
Avatar

>