Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

An RCA 140
#23

Well OK, but the output transformer is also a big offender. The whole set was so crammed into that chassis, that it appears that the output transformer was somewhat inadequate, especially sincw the operating conditions of the 53 were such that it could belch out 10 watts. In those few years, RCA was riding high, with their high power audio, but it was mostly, if not all, class B. If you opened the volume up all the way, you'd get lots of sound, but it was lousy (class B) sound.

The interstage transformer is a DRIVER transformer, so you'll notice on the schematic that the secondary DC resistance is lower than the primary resistance. The 56 is pushing a class B amplifier, and the grids do draw current.


Messages In This Thread
An RCA 140 - by exray - 09-28-2010, 08:41 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 09-28-2010, 08:46 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Ron Ramirez - 09-28-2010, 08:58 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 09-28-2010, 09:37 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Alan Douglas - 09-29-2010, 06:34 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by denver - 09-29-2010, 07:53 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 09-29-2010, 11:17 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 09-30-2010, 09:46 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 10-02-2010, 09:07 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Ken G - 10-11-2010, 08:05 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Allen in SB - 10-17-2010, 12:51 AM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 10-17-2010, 07:07 AM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 10-17-2010, 05:15 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Doug Houston - 11-23-2010, 01:30 AM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 11-23-2010, 06:06 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 11-24-2010, 08:19 AM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 11-29-2010, 06:27 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by FStephenMasek - 12-01-2010, 11:48 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Jayce - 12-02-2010, 03:38 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by exray - 12-02-2010, 04:40 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2010, 12:18 AM
Re: An RCA 140 - by TA Forbes - 12-09-2010, 09:07 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by Doug Houston - 01-01-2011, 08:44 PM
Re: An RCA 140 - by theboyzz - 01-29-2011, 12:14 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Hello Martin, Welcome aboard our little community what great Model 38-7 Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:30 AM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum Martin. I count about 9 paper caps, the 3 electrolytic caps and 2-Y2 safety caps to replace th...RodB — 09:44 PM
Part numbers to model cross
Jim, We have this index put together by Dale Cook but I don't think that is quite what you are looking for. The Parts...klondike98 — 09:37 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Yep the dim bulb test is OK but I'd definitely replace all those electrolytics before I did it. Since those #47 conden...klondike98 — 09:18 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The resistor is a 2.2 Meg, it was the last one I hadn't replaced. The broadcast is coming in after replacing it.osanders0311 — 09:09 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
What does the resistor measure? I think it should be 3.3 Meg. If the oscillator coil has continuity and the resistanc...RodB — 09:03 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Good idea to check the coils... then I'll get hold of an incadescent light bulb and see what happens when the unit is sw...Musaeum — 08:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
I have that same set, ain't too much shortwave I like anyway.....it is a good AM DX set. PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:32 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum, Martin! Open a new thread in Philco Electronic Restoration when you begin working on your 38-7. ...GarySP — 08:28 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum! :wave: Here's the schematic for that radio from our digital library: Something to do bef...klondike98 — 08:05 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>