1935 655MX

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

1935 655MX

Ron Ramirez
Silent Key

Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand State, Province, Country: Indiana

#14

01-20-2011, 02:08 PM

CRC (and its equivalents) is only good on switches and contacts that are just "a little" dirty. For the really bad contacts, only DeoxIT will have a chance of cleaning them enough so that they will work again. Believe me, I have learned this the hard way. A stubborn, "thrifty" old man (me) was finally made to realize that CRC isn't good enough by a demonstration of DeoxIT's superiority by a friend of mine some time back.

Heck, I even had a light switch in a ceiling fan that CRC "fixed" for about a week, only for it to stop working again. Gave it a shot of DeoxIT...good as new. Icon_smile

Of course, DeoxIT won't fix every switch or control, heal the sick, or raise the dead. But I have found it to be the very best contact cleaner on the market.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Thread Closed

Messages In This Thread

1935 655MX - by JGatewood - 12-31-2010, 08:39 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by greg denney - 12-31-2010, 09:20 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 12-31-2010, 09:31 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by 7estatdef - 12-31-2010, 10:38 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Glenn Roberts - 01-01-2011, 10:33 AM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 01-01-2011, 11:31 AM

Re: 1935 655MX - by bigron - 01-02-2011, 09:52 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 01-02-2011, 09:56 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Glenn Roberts - 01-03-2011, 05:25 AM

Re: 1935 655MX - by bigron - 01-08-2011, 12:29 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by greg denney - 01-20-2011, 02:20 AM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 01-20-2011, 09:07 AM

Re: 1935 655MX - by greg denney - 01-20-2011, 02:01 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 01-20-2011, 02:08 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by greg denney - 01-20-2011, 02:14 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Glenn Roberts - 01-20-2011, 07:07 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Ron Ramirez - 01-20-2011, 07:26 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by codefox1 - 01-20-2011, 10:49 PM

Re: 1935 655MX - by Glenn Roberts - 01-27-2011, 04:27 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps. The results: The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
I pulled the tube out and it's shorted from pin 1 to pin 2. I suppose that's the problem...sq65 — 08:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
bob Nice work on battery . If you don't. Have terminals i have a few spares Samsam — 02:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
hello mr Fixr, for sure !! I have some radios that I need to make some batteries for too. Sincerely richardradiorich — 12:33 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Dittos, sweet b on the battery. Love the "9 Lives" logo, remembered from my childhood. Other neat ones are t...MrFixr55 — 11:24 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
Hi Morzh, Dunno if the AC EMI caps are an issue. I never liked the concept but never had an issue with these causin...MrFixr55 — 11:21 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
And no hum without the 7AF7? Not common but I am thinking heater - cathode short. This would introduce hum in this sta...MrFixr55 — 11:14 PM

Who's Online

There are currently 1120 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1119 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me