Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 90 1st RF question
#2

That is very odd that your antenna coil would be, in essence, blocking reception if the continuity of both windings are good. Moisture absorption is the first thing that comes to my mind.

To answer your questions:

1. Once the primary is removed, you will be able to see the direction the turns need to be wound. I don't have my notes next to me, but it's either 200 or 250 turns of 38 gauge wire.

2. You remove the center spool by unsoldering the leads - first making notes on how the leads connect to the coil lug terminals, of course - then, using an instrument such as a socket wrench, gently pushing up on the spool. It is held in place by two tabs on top. One of the tabs may break; if it does, it can be glued back together.

3. Yes, it is most likely the correct coil, as the original antenna coil was made just as shown in your pictures.

4. While it is possible that someone could have substituted an incorrect coil, I sort of doubt it.

5. As I said, it could be moisture absorption. You might try baking the coil in your oven for 30 minutes at 180 degrees. This baking process is usually mandatory for Model 89 and 19 oscillator coils, and would certainly benefit other coils as well. Usually, a lightning hit will completely blacken that winding, and will normally make it go open as well.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Model 90 1st RF question - by mgutierres - 03-18-2011, 12:26 PM
RE: Model 90 1st RF question - by brett2752 - 01-28-2024, 04:27 PM
RE: Model 90 1st RF question - by Chas - 01-28-2024, 06:51 PM
Re: Model 90 1st RF question - by Ron Ramirez - 03-18-2011, 01:36 PM
Re: Model 90 1st RF question - by 7estatdef - 03-18-2011, 06:18 PM
Re: Model 90 1st RF question - by Steve Davis - 03-19-2011, 07:08 PM
Re: Model 90 1st RF question - by mgutierres - 03-23-2011, 10:01 PM
Re: Model 90 1st RF question - by 7estatdef - 03-24-2011, 02:10 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>