Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Joe's Maggie
#5

As Doug and Codefox have said, the original finish was lacquer. You should definitely use a grain filler. This is something I need to learn how to use, myself, so I can't give you any advice on how to do this. Perhaps one of the folks on here who are much better with cabinets than I am will chime in here with some how-tos.

The dye toner would be better than pigment, as the pigmented toner tends to accumulate fast and make your finish look like paint if you apply too many coats. Toning lacquer with dye is transparent and does not have this problem.

If you use a toner with dye, you should not have the problem with grain now showing.

Again, as for the exact procedure, it would be better if one of our more experienced refinishers would chime in here with the proper procedure. Steve Davis, Exray, and others whom I cannot think of right now can tell you all about that.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 03-27-2011, 12:14 AM
RE: Joe's Maggie - by ipwizard - 03-02-2012, 05:16 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Doug Houston - 03-27-2011, 08:38 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 03-30-2011, 11:59 AM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by codefox1 - 03-30-2011, 01:47 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Ron Ramirez - 03-31-2011, 07:44 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Steve Davis - 03-31-2011, 09:14 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 04-07-2011, 02:31 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 04-12-2011, 12:54 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Ron Ramirez - 04-12-2011, 01:10 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Doug Houston - 04-12-2011, 11:35 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Arran - 04-13-2011, 08:29 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 05-08-2011, 01:37 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by codefox1 - 05-08-2011, 03:59 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Steve Davis - 05-08-2011, 05:04 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 05-08-2011, 05:07 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 05-08-2011, 05:12 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 05-09-2011, 04:01 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 05-11-2011, 08:03 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Ron Ramirez - 05-11-2011, 08:13 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 09-26-2011, 08:34 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Ron Ramirez - 09-26-2011, 09:01 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by w4rtc - 02-15-2012, 11:49 PM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by codefox1 - 02-16-2012, 10:09 AM
Re: Joe's Maggie - by Ron Ramirez - 02-16-2012, 05:20 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>