Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12, 2025) x

Thread Closed

Philco 42-1016
#6

That's correct Ron... and... the speed is 33 1/3, and the "talking record" speed was 16 2/3, or half that speed. I remember the 16 2/3 was used a lot back in the 1950s and 1960s for recording books for the blind. I remember these records in the library, along with special heavy duty type record players.

Most people in this Phorum are too old to remember the big battle between RCA and Columbia over record speeds. Columbia came out with 33 1/3 records just before WW2, but paused their introduction during the war because nobody was making players, all manufacturing had turned to war production. They came back out with them after the war, when consumer production resumed. RCA came out with 45 RPM records right after, which they had been developing just before the war while Columbia was developing the 33 1/3. They claimed, correctly, that the 45 was capable of better fidelity, which it is because the groove vibrations from side to side are longer for a given frequency at the higher RPM. Remember, this was still in the days of monaural records. Anyway, both systems survived. The 33 1/3 became the standard for long playing albums. It was especially good for classical music recordings since they could fit an entire movement of a symphony on one side. RCA did make long playing 45s with microgrooves, but they only lasted 7 1/2 minutes at most per side. RCA even came out with some 45 "albums" with 2 songs on each side of the record, and 2 or 3 records in the box. Eventually the 45 became the standard for "singles" while the 33 1/3 became the standard for albums. My family were quite familiar with all this since my godmother started as a secretary for, and eventually became a vice president of RCA Camden. I still have more than a dozen of the boxed 45 "albums" from those early days.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 42-1016 - by fmlondon - 08-28-2021, 01:31 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-28-2021, 09:07 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by BrendaAnnD - 08-28-2021, 09:22 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by morzh - 08-28-2021, 06:15 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-28-2021, 07:26 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by mikethedruid - 08-28-2021, 08:09 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by fmlondon - 08-28-2021, 09:44 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco P45-6365 Universal Transformer Instruction Manual
Can anyone guide me to where this may be found?GRG — 03:00 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
I don't think that I have encountered a 12Z3 before, curious how it uses one of those but includes a #43, which is a 25 ...Arran — 02:17 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
It's the other forum. I'm also in DIY, but mostly read there. Honestly, I kinda jumped into this without much thought to...TV MAN — 10:43 AM
Philco 71 Code 125
Hello,  I am in need of a schematic for this radio. Mine has the three separate circular tube shields and a shadow me...dconant — 08:06 AM
Stromberg Carlson 1500 Squeal
And life just keeps getting more complicated.dconant — 07:57 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello Roy, here is this one sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:45 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, Had grabbed it already but thank you just the same.  I find myself wanting to find some way to block out the...glyphmon — 12:03 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello roy, here is a link to the schematic . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:54 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, The Silvertone 2014 also is a transformerless set, so I am incorporating a 1:1 600 ohm audio isolation transfo...glyphmon — 11:37 PM
Preliminary work on wife's Silvertone 2014
Did an alignment today which was interesting.  IF alignment went great, almost all was already spot-on.  Adjusting on th...glyphmon — 11:35 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>