Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 245
#7

Yes, Philco used a "2" prefix on American models to indicate a radio-phonograph in the 1930 and 1931 model years, but then switched to different nomenclature for those in American models in the 1932 season with a series of models with two digits starting with a 2. For example - model 23X used a 91 chassis.

1934 brought about the "500" series of radio-phonographs.

Then in 1936, their radio-phonographs carried the same model numbers as the matching radio chassis, only with a "P" in the model number. Ex.: 116PX used a 116 Code 122 chassis

Anyway...

Sometime in the mid-1930s, Philco added a "2" prefix to export model numbers, such as this 245.

I find it also interesting that this 245 was made for 115 volt, 50-60 cycle AC operation which was essentially the same as the USA standard. I seem to recall that most of Europe was on a 220 volt standard at the time, but I think France may have been using 115 volts then? I don't know about Portugal.

Regarding 39/44 vs 78E tubes. Both are remote-cutoff pentodes, and both have similar characteristics. The main difference is in the basing - the 39/44 has the suppressor grid internally connected to the cathode and uses a five-pin base, while the 78 (and 78E) have the suppressor grid lead brought out to a separate pin, requiring a six-pin base.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 245 - by edison - 12-11-2021, 01:24 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by Brad Winder - 12-11-2021, 01:42 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by RodB - 12-11-2021, 02:02 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by edison - 12-11-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-11-2021, 08:52 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by morzh - 12-12-2021, 10:56 AM
RE: Philco 245 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-12-2021, 11:28 AM
RE: Philco 245 - by morzh - 12-12-2021, 12:32 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by Arran - 12-12-2021, 12:52 PM
RE: Philco 245 - by edison - 12-12-2021, 07:42 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1338 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1335 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>