Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 82, restoration.
#16

Rich

>> What a nice-looking chassis I would grabbed it too .


Yeah.....and there was the rest of the radio attached to it too! Also nice-looking! Icon_lol



Rod

So far. I do not wanto to jinx things, but the guy who sold it to me said "I restored it, it works". Well, I am sure it works in the way in might even pull stations and speak, but as "restored it", considering the only two parts replaced are the two electrolytic caps, and the replacements are "Philco-Ford" (likely made before I was born), I would hardly call it "restoration". And the power cord is original, even though it is not falling apart, but it needs replacement also.

The "special" in AKs is their capacitor cans, which need to be opened. Unlike the 808A, this one has several smaller ones.

But the parts are higher quality than the Philco's. Even the flexible resistors are better made and even look sturdier, including the end terminations. The ones by Philco are easily detached, often on their own.
No, no, I am not maligning Philco; theirs, especially when compared to many that came after them is good quality, but that's just that, good. AK's is superb. Just the tube panels are something.

Well, I guess this was one of the factors that did the AK in; many people are willing to compromise on quality when buying things, if the price reflects it. And there is no limits to that, considering what crap from overseas we are buying today. Oh well....

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.


Messages In This Thread
Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 06:10 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 07:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 08:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 10:12 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 10:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-23-2022, 11:19 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-23-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 05-24-2022, 10:04 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Chas - 05-24-2022, 10:22 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-24-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Arran - 05-25-2022, 02:27 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-25-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-28-2022, 09:15 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 05-28-2022, 10:41 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-28-2022, 10:53 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 12:09 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-29-2022, 12:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 03:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-04-2022, 08:49 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-05-2022, 12:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 12:24 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 01:16 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 06-05-2022, 01:43 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 03:17 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 08:58 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 01:25 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:25 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:26 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 11:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 11:46 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 12:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 01:32 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by rfeenstra - 06-09-2022, 06:54 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-12-2022, 10:50 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-14-2022, 10:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-14-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-18-2022, 10:35 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-19-2022, 06:19 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-02-2022, 07:06 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 12:18 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 02:40 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 02:31 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 03:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 05:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 06:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-10-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-11-2022, 09:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-12-2022, 10:55 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 10:24 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 11:03 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 12:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 03:47 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:02 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-13-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by tbone - 07-14-2022, 07:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by PhilcoJohn - 07-14-2022, 07:42 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-14-2022, 08:33 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 07-14-2022, 06:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-15-2022, 09:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-15-2022, 11:48 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by MrFixr55 - 07-16-2022, 11:23 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-16-2022, 12:45 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Gilfillan Brothers Car Radio?
Is it possible that the 0Z4 is actually a 6Z4/84? Also the tubes that came with the radio may not all be the correct on...Joe Rossi — 05:01 PM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Definitely 870044RossH — 01:12 PM
12' Philco
Wonder if the chassis was big too.daveone23 — 12:38 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
Hi Ron, I have sent Radio Daze my concerns with the dial so I guess we will see. They used my original to make the repro...dconant — 12:27 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
How does the  5W4 and 83 tube filaments get fed?martinj — 12:25 PM
462ron
Hi Dan, your original dial appears to be lighter, easier to allow light through. My original is similar except it’s crac...462ron — 12:07 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
I received my new 38-2 dial. I'm a little disappointed. As you can see in the picture the blues have a white shadow. The...dconant — 11:13 AM
Philco 38-2 Low Volume
I have been playing my 38-2 for a while now and it is doing very well. I did have to replace the 6A8 (osc) as it develop...dconant — 11:03 AM
Philco Speaker Spider
Hello, Does anyone with a 3 D printer make the spiders for those old Philco speakers? That might be a good idea for some...dconant — 09:41 AM
Philco 16B Parts
Hello, I'm looking to buy a 16B but I'm not so sure of what I am looking at. First as seen from the picture it looks lik...dconant — 09:17 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1525 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1522 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>