Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-608
#14

The schematic shows a .004mfd cap (part 65) connected to a 220k resistor. Your photo shows the .003mfd cap connected to a 220K resistor. You will have to verify that the two parts physically the same by comparing the schematic to the wiring. When you replace parts that are 60 to 80 years old there is a world of unknown possibilities that can happen over that period. Including incorrect part identification like part 56 in your schematic. It looks like a 0.002mfd cap but the parts list says it's a 0.004mfd. Minor differences like this are common and what you use to replace the part is immaterial since 80 years ago the tolerance ratings for these parts was 20%. Same for the 8-12-16 electrolytics. The only one to be concerned about is the 12. It's attached to the rectifier cathode so there is a maximum value for that cap. Quite often I let my wallet tell me what value to buy, if I need a 0.004 and three 0.005 caps I'll buy ten 0.0047s because I can pay less for the ten than the four. Hope this is clear the numbers get in the way.


Messages In This Thread
41-608 - by philco4me - 01-08-2024, 08:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by David - 01-08-2024, 09:04 PM
RE: 41-608 - by klondike98 - 01-08-2024, 09:19 PM
RE: 41-608 - by Radioroslyn - 01-08-2024, 09:21 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-08-2024, 09:36 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-09-2024, 09:27 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-11-2024, 03:31 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-11-2024, 03:49 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-12-2024, 02:50 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-13-2024, 01:52 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-13-2024, 02:01 PM
RE: 41-608 - by klondike98 - 01-14-2024, 02:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-22-2024, 01:22 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-22-2024, 02:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-22-2024, 03:22 PM
RE: 41-608 - by radiorich - 01-23-2024, 12:04 AM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-23-2024, 10:44 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-23-2024, 08:45 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-24-2024, 11:43 AM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-24-2024, 06:19 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-24-2024, 07:17 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-29-2024, 11:05 PM
RE: 41-608 - by radiorich - 01-30-2024, 10:04 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-30-2024, 11:52 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5295 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5294 Guest(s)
Avatar

>