Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco And The LP
#9

the 70s "stereo" console we had used a 1" cylinder with included mechanism for changing 45s. We could stack 10-15 of them. the mechanism was WAY BETTER then the slanted stack rod used for the LPs. Even as a young kid I recognized that. Although we never had issues with non-changing LPs, but the drop seemed to be more prone to damage the record than the way it fell on the 45s.

regarding changing the standard for smaller holes. that would have made little sense. A big part of the market for singles has always been the jukebox company, until they made CD ones; about when 45s stopped being produced. Making 45s with smaller holes would have been incompatible with jukes still in operation, plus a certain quantity of 45s players still in existence. You cannot change a standard in a non-backward-compatible fashion just because you stop producing the reader; that wouldn't be good marketing.

-Mars


Messages In This Thread
Philco And The LP - by PHILLYPHILCO - 10-11-2011, 08:00 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by PHILLYPHILCO - 10-11-2011, 08:20 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Ron Ramirez - 10-11-2011, 08:26 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Chuck Schwark - 10-11-2011, 09:44 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Doug Houston - 10-12-2011, 10:32 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Arran - 10-13-2011, 01:19 AM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Don Lind - 10-13-2011, 01:59 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Arran - 10-13-2011, 07:40 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Marsupial - 10-13-2011, 10:40 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Arran - 10-14-2011, 01:18 AM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Marsupial - 10-14-2011, 09:24 AM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Arran - 10-15-2011, 12:20 AM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Doug Houston - 10-20-2011, 12:02 AM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Arran - 10-20-2011, 10:41 PM
Re: Philco And The LP - by Jayce - 10-21-2011, 02:56 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
So, here's Prince on stage halfway through Purple Rain when he stoops down to his tech and says "Rod, pull out that...RodB — 09:17 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1003 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1002 Guest(s)
Avatar

>