Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Which Philco radio to restore next? A 38-620 or a 41-256?
#4

Hi Tom, and welcome.

The difference between the 41-255 and 41-256 is the frequency coverage. The two SW bands in the 256 cover a higher range of frequencies than the 255 does.

Both use the same basic circuit otherwise, and the same number of tubes (9).

Not good or bad, just different. Well, it also means your 256 won't pick up much shortwave at night - stations in the higher range of frequencies come in better during the day. The 49 and 41 meter bands (6 and 7 mc, roughly) open up in the evening, and your 256 will not pick up these frequencies.

Maybe this is why there doesn't seem to be a lot of 41-256 sets out there, compared to the 41-255 which was usable on SW day or night. Plus, the 41-256 was a mid-season set; it didn't come into the market until January 1941, while the 41-255 came out at the beginning of the 1941 selling season (June 1940).

The 38-620 will be the easier of the two sets to restore. No rubber-covered wiring. And even though you will have the headache of dealing with the RF unit in the 38-620, it will be a breeze compared to the rubber-covered wiring nightmare of the 41-256. You will have to either replace all of the wires in the 256, or do like I do and unsolder one end of a wire, remove what is left of the rotten rubber insulation, slide on some heat shrink tubing, shrink it, resolder, move on to the next one. It is very time consuming, but the radio should be a very good performer when you are done with it. You say you have already done some of this on a GE radio, so you know what you are facing.

I have, among other 1939-1942 Philco sets that also have this wonderful rubber insulation, a 41-616 that I plan to start on in the next few weeks. It's really going to be a nightmare, 15 tubes and Mystery Control.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
So, here's Prince on stage halfway through Purple Rain when he stoops down to his tech and says "Rod, pull out that...RodB — 09:17 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Today I finished inspecting all the parts. The result is not very pleasing. The first positive news: 1) The power tr...Vlad95 — 11:40 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, found muh culprit. After using socket test adapters and finding voltages all ok, swapping 6V6s, no avail, swapped ...TV MAN — 11:18 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1007 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1004 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>