Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1942 Philco 400
#1

After fighting with myself for the last month, I rearranged the cellar again and made enough room for the Philco 42-400. I went and got it today. I brought three radios with me to try and do some trading to get the price down. He also has a grandmother clock that needs some help so I brought that back also to work on. At this point no $$ has changed hands so I am happy!!
Here are some pics:
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...42-400.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400a.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400b.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400c.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400d.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400e.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400f.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...2-400g.jpg]

I have done a polish on the cabinet and it doesn't look too bad. I need to pull the speaker board to get the bottom of the louvers good and clean.The chassis is absolutely filthy, BUT remarkably the wiring is in excellent condition. According to paper labels on the tubes and chassis this was actually serviced here in Claremont by Hodge Radio and TV repair in 1948. The place still stands where the shop was.

I do have a question.....the dial lights and the cabinet lights are not the same. two are 44's and two are 47's. The Philco RMS book only lists one part number for both, so should they be 44 or 47?

It's a GOOD DAY Icon_biggrin


Messages In This Thread
1942 Philco 400 - by Gene Pederson - 11-17-2011, 08:07 PM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by 7estatdef - 11-17-2011, 10:53 PM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Doug Houston - 11-18-2011, 01:22 AM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Gene Pederson - 01-10-2012, 11:29 PM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by SamTanner - 01-11-2012, 07:31 AM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Gene Pederson - 01-11-2012, 10:03 AM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-11-2012, 11:28 AM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Doug Houston - 01-11-2012, 11:28 PM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Gene Pederson - 01-12-2012, 05:52 PM
Re: 1942 Philco 400 - by Sean - 01-13-2012, 09:03 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
PT-6 antenna connections
Notice in the schematic the notch at the bottom of the antenna coil is between pins 3 & 4.RodB — 07:34 PM
bridkarl
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM
PT-6 antenna connections
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6. I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM
40-150 General questions
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM
40-150 General questions
I think RobB has it right. It is a part number and looks like its stamped on the chassis and that wasn't something you ...klondike98 — 11:41 AM
40-150 General questions
It's most likely a part number. Most of Philco part numbers are in that format. I looked at the parts list for this mode...RodB — 08:10 AM
40-150 General questions
Hi Kevin, No, I don't but I like your Quote about being a good electrician. The way I look at it is "The fact ...MrFixr55 — 08:06 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3026 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3024 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>