Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-616 needs feet?
#3

Wow, Tubular Bob's set even has the hard-to-find original three-post De Luxe changer, built by Webster-Chicago. Icon_thumbup

The trouble with those changers, as Doug Houston and Gib Epling at West-Tech have told me, is that the pot metal parts used had the problem of crumbling away over time, rendering the changer useless.

My 41-616 was missing its original changer when I bought it. I've decided not to bother trying to get an original; I will be substituting a 1942 Philco BOL changer instead, pulled from a dead 42-1010. The 1942 changers use a solenoid to trip the reject mechanism, as did the 1941 De Luxe three-post changers; so I will be able to make the changer reject records with the far right button and with the Mystery Control, as original.

I was hoping to get my 41-616 playing in time for Christmas, but as it is now December 2 and I haven't started on it yet, that probably isn't going to happen in time for this Christmas. Replacing all of that wonderful rubber insulation is going to be quite a job, not to mention the 18,492 capacitors in that thing. Maybe I'll have it done in time for my birthday (April) instead.

But we're not answering your question about feet, are we, Mark?

I seriously doubt that any detailed drawings of the feet exist. I could try to photograph a close-up of one of the feet on my 41-616, and could supply dimensions, but that's about all I can do.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
41-616 needs feet? - by mat68046 - 12-01-2011, 01:26 AM
Re: 41-616 needs feet? - by rocketeer - 12-02-2011, 10:04 AM
Re: 41-616 needs feet? - by Ron Ramirez - 12-02-2011, 09:02 PM
Re: 41-616 needs feet? - by mat68046 - 12-04-2011, 06:08 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>