Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

New Project - 39-55
#30

Hmmm. All this talk of 6A8 vs. 6J8 tubes has me curious. I have a 39-55 out in the garage; I picked it up really cheap to have an extra stepper unit in case I find the one in my 41-616 is bad once I get started restoring it. I'll have to see what kind of det-osc tube it has in it.

Overly simplified comparison of the 6A8 and 6J8:

The 6A8 does not have a separate oscillator section, but the first two grids in the 6A8 perform the same function as the grid and plate of the triode section of the 6J8. In the 6A8, G1 is the oscillator grid and G2 is the oscillator "plate." The local oscillator signal produced here is mixed with the incoming RF signal from G4 to produce a third signal, or intermediate frequency.

In the 6J8, the (separate) oscillator grid G1 is connected to G3 of the heptode (mixer) section in order to inject the local oscillator signal; this is mixed with the incoming RF from G1 of the heptode section to produce the IF frequency.

In the 6A8, G3 and G5 are dual screen grids; in the heptode section of the 6J8, G2 and G4 are the screens. The heptode section of the 6J8 has an additional suppressor grid (G5), tied to the common cathode.

Compare both and you will see they have essentially the same pinout. Pins 2 and 7 - filament; 3 - plate; 4 - screen; 5 - oscillator grid; 6 - oscillator plate; 8 - cathode.

Can they substitute for one another? The tube substitution guides say "yes." While they might pass in an AM-only set, if the set has SW you should stick with the tube the set was designed for. Some even advocate using a 6K8 (a triode-hexode converter similar to the 6J8 but without the suppressor grid) in place of the 6J8.

Remember, any substitutions will affect alignment.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 04:26 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 02-28-2012, 04:40 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 04:46 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 04:45 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 05:00 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Glenn Roberts - 02-28-2012, 05:45 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Bob Andersen - 02-28-2012, 07:02 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 02-28-2012, 07:06 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 07:13 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 02-28-2012, 07:17 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 08:01 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 02-28-2012, 08:11 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 02-28-2012, 11:23 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 02-28-2012, 11:43 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 02-29-2012, 01:31 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-01-2012, 12:32 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 03-01-2012, 07:04 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-06-2012, 06:37 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Arran - 03-06-2012, 09:14 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-06-2012, 07:04 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-06-2012, 11:27 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Arran - 03-10-2012, 12:52 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 03-06-2012, 09:34 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Bob Andersen - 03-07-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-07-2012, 12:21 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-07-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-11-2012, 08:51 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-10-2012, 11:59 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Arran - 03-10-2012, 09:15 PM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 03-11-2012, 01:45 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-11-2012, 08:38 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-11-2012, 10:51 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by w4rtc - 03-11-2012, 11:03 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 04-06-2012, 01:04 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 04-11-2012, 01:10 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by ipwizard - 04-13-2012, 01:47 AM
RE: New Project - 39-55 - by codefox1 - 04-13-2012, 02:11 AM



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
Welcome Eric, I agree with Bob and far as the two main electrolytic filter capacitors did you change them yourself or w...radiorich — 11:43 PM
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
You mentioned the Philco manual and going through the check points...just to be sure we're on the same page here's the m...klondike98 — 08:13 PM
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
Interesting. I haven't seen that before.klondike98 — 07:02 PM
12' Philco
Yes I had looked for it on the web as well some time back and could not find it. I was glad to see it turned up in Ron'...klondike98 — 06:59 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Now if you had a set with a tuning light then the bulb type is important to the circuit, some sets used those prior to t...Arran — 04:58 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Ok. Thanks for the correction.RossH — 03:09 PM
Model 28L
For 28 you will probably need to buy a Hammond 125CSE. Or any of the series of the power you need, with SE suffix. Then ...morzh — 02:09 PM
37-60 revision 6
I am restoring a Philco 37-60 and it shows run 6 they removed the ground from G3 of the 6K7G and put the G3 to -2.5v for...bobbyd1200 — 01:01 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Mike is correct on the bulb connection, two separate circuits. I found that by rotating the bulb and sliding it forward ...RodB — 12:19 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Cleaned ann contacts, switches and sockets, works great now.martinj — 11:32 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>