Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Majestic 181
#4

(03-24-2012, 01:03 PM)Jayce Wrote:  I can't figure out why Majestic used pot metal for the tuning plates in this set. It's not a low-cost set and I have lower quality and lower cost sets from that same year that use copper plates. Even Philco used better plates. Seems someone was trying to squeeze out a little more profit at Majestic. Icon_confused

The pot metal isn't in the tuning plates themselves it's in the hub that mounts the plates to the tuning condenser shaft. To my knowledge no manufacturer attempted to make condenser plates out of pot metal even back in the 20s.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-23-2012, 11:42 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 03-24-2012, 02:34 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-24-2012, 01:03 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 03-24-2012, 09:26 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-24-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-24-2012, 10:43 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-24-2012, 10:40 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Doug Houston - 03-25-2012, 12:56 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by TA Forbes - 03-25-2012, 12:57 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-25-2012, 01:18 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Doug Houston - 03-25-2012, 09:33 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-25-2012, 10:51 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 03-26-2012, 12:05 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Doug Houston - 03-26-2012, 11:14 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by TA Forbes - 03-27-2012, 01:54 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by codefox1 - 03-27-2012, 09:03 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Doug Houston - 04-05-2012, 11:19 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 03-27-2012, 07:43 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 03-29-2012, 07:56 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 04-03-2012, 11:30 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Doug Houston - 03-29-2012, 11:53 PM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Jayce - 04-04-2012, 12:39 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by codefox1 - 04-04-2012, 02:57 AM
RE: Majestic 181 - by Arran - 04-05-2012, 01:26 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The resistor is a 2.2 Meg, it was the last one I hadn't replaced. The broadcast is coming in after replacing it.osanders0311 — 09:09 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
What does the resistor measure? I think it should be 3.3 Meg. If the oscillator coil has continuity and the resistanc...RodB — 09:03 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Good idea to check the coils... then I'll get hold of an incadescent light bulb and see what happens when the unit is sw...Musaeum — 08:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
I have that same set, ain't too much shortwave I like anyway.....it is a good AM DX set. PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:32 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum, Martin! Open a new thread in Philco Electronic Restoration when you begin working on your 38-7. ...GarySP — 08:28 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum! :wave: Here's the schematic for that radio from our digital library: Something to do bef...klondike98 — 08:05 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Hi all, on vacation in Montreal,  a friend of mine showed me a Philco Model 38-7 console radio from the 30ies. Mechan...Musaeum — 07:21 PM
Part numbers to model cross
I looked thru the documents and did not see one. Might have missed it though.Jim Dutridge — 07:16 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Please tell me this was it, I replaced resistor 27 and it's playing on the broadcast band. I am afraid to change the ban...osanders0311 — 06:12 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
So far still no broadcast, I am posting pictures of #14 Oscillator and also a resistor #27 which connects to an XXL tube...osanders0311 — 04:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1016 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1013 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>