Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mon UGLY 9s262
#20

(05-08-2012, 11:30 PM)Arran Wrote:  
(05-08-2012, 09:44 PM)Gene Pederson Wrote:  Yes, it appears that is what they did. That was why I originally asked the question about the photo finish. I am not a woodworker, but I thought I might be able to stain the wood to try and blend it in with the rest. Will that be possible? These are not the only two spots.
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...r/topc.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...r/topb.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...r/topa.jpg]
[Image: http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z345...r/topd.jpg]

Gene

Unfortunately I don't think it will be possible to blend those areas in with the rest, there are too many of them and the area is too large, it looks like the rubbed through areas are as wide as 5/8'' in places and 3 inches long. It looks like someone may have attacked the veneer with a sander. I'm not a brand Z aficionado but it also looks like someone may have removed the veneer from the shoulders on top of the cabinet, it would not have been solid wood like that. I case you are wondering the damaged veneer is quarter sawn French walnut which you can still find, you can also still find the quilted maple veneer as well. Neither type is particularly expensive but it's finicky to replace if you've never tried it before.
I hate to be a party pooper but you may be better off finding an empty cabinet, the only way to repair that sort of obliterating the grain with a dark finish or paint would be to re-veneer the damaged portions by removing a strip of veneer, or re-veneer over the entire control panel section. The shoulders will also need to be reveneered, fortunately you don't have to deal with removing any damaged material there at least. There is nothing worst to deal with then a sloppy hack job on a cabinet except maybe a butchered chassis, unfortunately unlike the electrics every slob out there thinks he can do professional refinishing work after a trip to the hardware store.
Regards
Arran

There's always a compromise. I think the damaged areas could be restored with artist's oil based pigments with a spotting brush after stripping and before new finish coat is applied.

That being said, nothing wrong with "Patina" which of course include the less than competent last attempt at refinishing. Early on I ripped through enough veneer to make my coffiin.


Messages In This Thread
Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 10:26 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-05-2012, 11:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 11:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-06-2012, 12:19 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-07-2012, 11:32 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-05-2012, 11:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 01:28 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by TA Forbes - 05-06-2012, 01:36 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 04:23 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 05:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 05:52 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 08:35 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 09:53 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-07-2012, 11:34 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 11:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 08:20 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-08-2012, 09:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-08-2012, 11:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 05-09-2012, 02:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-09-2012, 04:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-09-2012, 07:37 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 11:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 01:14 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 02:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 03:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 03:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 05:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:39 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:18 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:24 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 04:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 05:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-21-2012, 09:59 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 10:27 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 11:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-22-2012, 09:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-22-2012, 12:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 12:48 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 02:07 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-23-2012, 07:27 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 06:09 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-24-2012, 12:33 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-24-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-29-2012, 03:45 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-29-2012, 11:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-30-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-30-2012, 09:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-03-2012, 10:55 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-04-2012, 02:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-06-2012, 08:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-07-2012, 05:13 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-08-2012, 08:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-09-2012, 06:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-09-2012, 11:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-10-2012, 10:01 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-10-2012, 10:13 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-10-2012, 10:40 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 06-10-2012, 01:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-11-2012, 10:18 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-11-2012, 06:41 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 09-10-2012, 08:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Joe Rossi - 09-15-2012, 09:22 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
With regard to the speaker, unless the cone is so brittle that it crumbles as soon as you touch it I would try to repair...Arran — 04:07 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
That silver can capacitor is an aluminum electrolytic. You should replace it with an aluminum electrolytic with the valu...RodB — 11:46 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Thank you Rodb and Gary for helping with clarification on these capacitors. Other than the Tiny 630volt one I'm not sure...osanders0311 — 10:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Hello All; I found the CMB41L down in the basement, it is definitely a 1950-51 model, the capacitors have date codes ...Arran — 07:48 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi, all the caps I order, other than the electrolytics, are of the 630V rating. No worries on it being too high, and no ...gary rabbitt — 05:46 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi, there's a lot to consider when designing these circuits so you shouldn't have a lot of concern when replacing caps. ...RodB — 02:03 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
I have ordered and received new caps for this radio and hope I've ordered the correct ones. I tried matching them to the...osanders0311 — 11:35 AM
Philco newbie with P-1891-WA console questions
Hello Jeff , Far as the Electrolytic capacitors go here is a list of parts. that will work . I like using Nichicon and...radiorich — 09:50 PM
Philco newbie with P-1891-WA console questions
Well, I've been stumped at trying to get the first of 11 electrolytic capacitors. I got a schematic and have a list of t...Jeffcon — 07:54 PM
Model 80 Antenna Issue?
Thanks Gary and Rod.  I also found an article in the Philco Repair Bench under Service Hints and Tips, about installi...Hamilton — 12:32 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>