Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mon UGLY 9s262
#22

(05-09-2012, 04:00 PM)Gene Pederson Wrote:  Thanks for the info on the veneer Arran.

I don't know what the odds are on finding another cabinet in good condition. For now I am stripping this cabinet (half done) of the green paint and the polyurethane that was put on it. I have seen pics of this model that was redone using black as the contrast where the green was on this cabinet. There is actually one that was on radioattic done in black accenting that sold for $1050.00 I believe. Go figure.

Codefox, I will try to get more info on the method you mentioned and see if I think I can manage that. I have also seen cabinets that people have redone that had photofinish on them that was worn away. I will have to weigh my options and see which way to go.

Gene

One problem with Radioattic is unlike fleabay they only tell your whether the set listed has sold not how much it sold for, all that it gives you is the asking price when it was still available. But lets just say, for the sake of arguement, that your brand Z set is worth $500 in nicely restored condition as a conservative figure, then I figure it's worth spending the time or money restoring it properly especially if you intend to keep it. If we were talking about a common wooden table radio not worth $50 that would be another story, though such a set makes for a good practice cabinet since there isn't anything to ruin.
The way I figure it it will take just as much time to touch up the rubbed through areas as it would to reveneer and I have my doubts as to how well they would blend in with the rest. If it was only a narrow sliver worn through at the edge then I would say that touching up would be the best way to go, in fact medium walnut tone spray would largely obscure it, but these are wide and across the grain. If I were going to experiment with trying to touch up these areas I would try it right now while the cabinet is apart, then if it doesn't look right it's easy to strip it off and go with plan B. It's your call of course but since the cabinet has already been dismantled and is being stripped those areas are much easier to work on then if the cabinet were together. If you chose to farm out the work shipping the cabinet parts to a competitent restorer, like the fellow that Ron is using for his 17X, seems practical.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 10:26 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-05-2012, 11:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 11:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-06-2012, 12:19 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-07-2012, 11:32 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-05-2012, 11:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 01:28 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by TA Forbes - 05-06-2012, 01:36 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 04:23 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 05:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 05:52 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 08:35 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 09:53 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-07-2012, 11:34 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 11:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 08:20 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-08-2012, 09:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-08-2012, 11:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 05-09-2012, 02:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-09-2012, 04:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-09-2012, 07:37 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 11:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 01:14 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 02:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 03:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 03:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 05:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:39 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:18 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:24 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 04:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 05:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-21-2012, 09:59 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 10:27 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 11:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-22-2012, 09:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-22-2012, 12:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 12:48 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 02:07 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-23-2012, 07:27 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 06:09 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-24-2012, 12:33 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-24-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-29-2012, 03:45 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-29-2012, 11:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-30-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-30-2012, 09:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-03-2012, 10:55 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-04-2012, 02:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-06-2012, 08:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-07-2012, 05:13 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-08-2012, 08:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-09-2012, 06:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-09-2012, 11:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-10-2012, 10:01 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-10-2012, 10:13 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-10-2012, 10:40 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 06-10-2012, 01:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-11-2012, 10:18 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-11-2012, 06:41 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 09-10-2012, 08:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Joe Rossi - 09-15-2012, 09:22 AM



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
I found that the wire insulation was burnt.  The fly back needs corona dope! Why would someone put that there?Platinumblonde36 — 01:09 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
This is what it looked like beforePlatinumblonde36 — 01:01 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
Platinumblonde36 — 12:58 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
Platinumblonde36 — 12:57 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
I'm finding some strange things in my set and for the most part it's also original, so I need to start going over everyt...Platinumblonde36 — 12:55 AM
12' Philco
Not anymore Mike. Andre The Giant Born: May 19, 1946, Coulommiers, France Died: Jan 28, 1993 (46 years), Paris, Fran...RodB — 11:53 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Renovated Radios do carry what you need. As for the voltage, a wire should be at least 300V-rated.morzh — 11:13 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>