Mon UGLY 9s262

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Mon UGLY 9s262

Gene Pederson
Senior Member

Posts: 309
Threads: 55
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Claremont, NH

#31

05-21-2012, 03:18 PM

Ron,
I am using Internet Explorer which I have been right along. I may give the Firefox a shot; I used to use that a few years back. I have no trouble on any other site other than Photobucket............

Gene

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 10:26 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-05-2012, 11:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 11:17 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-06-2012, 12:19 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-07-2012, 11:32 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-05-2012, 11:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 01:28 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by TA Forbes - 05-06-2012, 01:36 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 04:23 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 05:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 05:52 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 08:35 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 09:53 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-07-2012, 11:34 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 11:15 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 08:20 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-08-2012, 09:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 09:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-08-2012, 11:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 05-09-2012, 02:47 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-09-2012, 04:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-09-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 01:14 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 02:42 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 03:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 05:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:39 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:47 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:18 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:24 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 04:57 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 05:57 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-21-2012, 09:59 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 10:27 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 11:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-22-2012, 09:02 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-22-2012, 12:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 12:48 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 02:07 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-23-2012, 07:27 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 06:09 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-24-2012, 12:33 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-24-2012, 12:28 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-29-2012, 03:45 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-29-2012, 11:42 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-30-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-30-2012, 09:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-03-2012, 10:55 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-04-2012, 02:12 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-06-2012, 08:15 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-07-2012, 05:13 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-08-2012, 08:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-09-2012, 06:05 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-09-2012, 11:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-10-2012, 10:01 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-10-2012, 10:13 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-10-2012, 10:40 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 06-10-2012, 01:12 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-11-2012, 10:18 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-11-2012, 06:41 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 09-10-2012, 08:05 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Joe Rossi - 09-15-2012, 09:22 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
Welcome Eric, I agree with Bob and far as the two main electrolytic filter capacitors did you change them yourself or w...radiorich — 11:43 PM
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
You mentioned the Philco manual and going through the check points...just to be sure we're on the same page here's the m...klondike98 — 08:13 PM
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
Interesting. I haven't seen that before.klondike98 — 07:02 PM
12' Philco
Yes I had looked for it on the web as well some time back and could not find it. I was glad to see it turned up in Ron'...klondike98 — 06:59 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Now if you had a set with a tuning light then the bulb type is important to the circuit, some sets used those prior to t...Arran — 04:58 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Ok. Thanks for the correction.RossH — 03:09 PM
Model 28L
For 28 you will probably need to buy a Hammond 125CSE. Or any of the series of the power you need, with SE suffix. Then ...morzh — 02:09 PM
37-60 revision 6
I am restoring a Philco 37-60 and it shows run 6 they removed the ground from G3 of the 6K7G and put the G3 to -2.5v for...bobbyd1200 — 01:01 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Mike is correct on the bulb connection, two separate circuits. I found that by rotating the bulb and sliding it forward ...RodB — 12:19 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Cleaned ann contacts, switches and sockets, works great now.martinj — 11:32 AM

Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me