Mon UGLY 9s262

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Mon UGLY 9s262

morzh
Odobenus rosmarus

Posts: 15,806
Threads: 553
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ

#34

05-21-2012, 04:57 PM

You know, no matter what anyone says (not close to the original etc) it looks good. Not everyone is an expert enough to critique this. I am certainly not.

The only thing is, I would choose a lighter stain, as, first, the original is lighter quite a bit, and then the black dial looks better with lighter surroundings, due to contrast.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 10:26 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-05-2012, 11:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 11:17 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-06-2012, 12:19 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-07-2012, 11:32 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-05-2012, 11:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 01:28 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by TA Forbes - 05-06-2012, 01:36 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 04:23 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 05:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 05:52 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 08:35 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 09:53 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-07-2012, 11:34 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 11:15 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 08:20 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-08-2012, 09:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 09:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-08-2012, 11:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 05-09-2012, 02:47 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-09-2012, 04:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-09-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 01:14 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 02:42 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 03:07 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 05:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:39 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 08:47 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:18 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:24 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 04:57 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 05:57 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-21-2012, 09:59 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 10:27 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 11:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-22-2012, 09:02 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-22-2012, 12:30 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 12:48 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 02:07 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-23-2012, 07:27 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 06:09 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-24-2012, 12:33 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-24-2012, 12:28 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-29-2012, 03:45 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-29-2012, 11:42 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-30-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-30-2012, 09:06 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-03-2012, 10:55 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-04-2012, 02:12 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-06-2012, 08:15 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-07-2012, 05:13 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-08-2012, 08:44 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-09-2012, 06:05 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-09-2012, 11:00 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-10-2012, 10:01 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-10-2012, 10:13 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-10-2012, 10:40 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 06-10-2012, 01:12 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-11-2012, 10:18 AM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-11-2012, 06:41 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 09-10-2012, 08:05 PM

RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Joe Rossi - 09-15-2012, 09:22 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
I found that the wire insulation was burt The fly back needs corona dope! Why would someone put that ...Platinumblonde36 — 01:09 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
This is what it looked like beforePlatinumblonde36 — 01:01 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
Platinumblonde36 — 12:58 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
Platinumblonde36 — 12:57 AM
Philco Predicta Siesta picture over time getting dimmer
I'm finding some strange things in my set and for the most part it's also original, so I need to start going over everyt...Platinumblonde36 — 12:55 AM
12' Philco
Not anymore Mike. Andre The Giant Born: May 19, 1946, Coulommiers, France Died: Jan 28, 1993 (46 years), Paris, Fran...RodB — 11:53 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Renovated Radios do carry what you need. As for the voltage, a wire should be at least 300V-rated.morzh — 11:13 PM

Who's Online

There are currently 4683 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4682 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me