Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

electrolitics grunow 589
#8

It's very easy to get the filter cap wiring mixed up on one of these early to mid 1930s sets if you aren't careful. Not only did they used to use different grounding points for each cap sometimes they had the positive side tied together with the speaker field coil on the negative side. In some cases they would have a single cap in one can and a two or more section cap in the other, the Rogers Ten-60 I am working on was wired this way. Many time the innards of the filter can had no connection to the can itself.
With regard to the resistors you can usually test them in place, unless that resistor happens to be connected in parallel with a coil or another resistor. When it comes to replacement if they are within 20% or better of what they are supposed to be I leave them, with the exception of ones that are normally buried and inaccessible without tearing the radio apart, like some of the ones are in my Rogers Ten-60. If the volume is low one common think that can fail is the plate resistor on the first audio tube, sometimes they used a 1/4 Watt where they should have used a 1/2 Watt.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
electrolitics grunow 589 - by murf - 12-01-2012, 12:57 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by codefox1 - 12-01-2012, 01:44 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by morzh - 12-01-2012, 04:08 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by TA Forbes - 12-01-2012, 08:50 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by morzh - 12-01-2012, 09:06 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by murf - 12-01-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by murf - 12-14-2012, 04:54 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by Arran - 12-14-2012, 11:34 PM
RE: electrolitics grunow 589 - by murf - 12-15-2012, 12:51 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>