Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Transformer P/N 32-7887 - am I up a creek?
#11

OK, the Canadian tie in was just a wild guess on my part as to why it has the 230 V option. There is not brass plaque on the back. I did note on the parts list that there was also a 25 Hz transformer option.

ON TO ANOTHER REQUEST REGARDING THIS TRANSFORMER: I've made contact with the Heyboer and removed the transformer from the chassis (taking pictures all the way). The secondary is intact; it ohms out pretty much per-spec as shown on the schematic and it's the primary that smoked. Here's the relevant section of the schematic:

http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy193...2a9c3.jpeg

I'm trying to work out what specification I should give Heyboer for the input / output voltage. I think 120Vac for a single primary is reasonable (I've elected to forego the unneeded complication of routing the leads for a dual voltage primary to the top side of the transformer since I'll never use them, and just mount the jumper there for appearence sake). So that leaves the O.C. secondary voltage specification. Starting with a "typical" working plate voltage for the 6L6 output tubes in push-pull and working backwards through the filter components & rectifier. I came up with about 600 Vac (RMS) (300 V from the end to the center tap of the secondary). But to sanity check myself I took a look at the power supply design section of an old radio handbook from that era and the general formulas in there point to just under 500 Vac (250 V end to center tap) as the target secondary voltage for a supply with a capacitive input filter. I don't have anything in my reference material for this set that says what the typical operating values are in circuit. It would be just GREAT if someone who has 38-690 happens to have that information. Lacking that, I open to suggestions.

Under the heading of FWIW, in case you're wondering who you're chatting with, I also uploaded a photo of me taken a few years ago when there was a bit more hair and it wasn't at gray; I think you'll reconginze the little set on the left:

http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy193...radios.jpg


Dave Perkins
Old Radios
Old Volvos
and homebrew beer !


Messages In This Thread



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
bob  Nice work on battery . If you don't. Have terminals i have a few spares  Samsam — 02:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
hello mr Fixr, for sure !! I have some radios that I need to make some batteries for too. Sincerely richardradiorich — 12:33 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Dittos, sweet b on the battery. Love the "9 Lives" logo, remembered from my childhood. Other neat ones are t...MrFixr55 — 11:24 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
Hi Morzh, Dunno if the AC EMI caps are an issue. I never liked the concept but never had an issue with these causin...MrFixr55 — 11:21 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
And no hum without the 7AF7? Not common but I am thinking heater - cathode short. This would introduce hum in this sta...MrFixr55 — 11:14 PM
schematics
Those filter caps in the cardboard tube are easy to restuff, especially the kind with the rolled over end. You don't hav...Arran — 09:56 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
If you have 5 wires, do this: The wires that go to thick-wire wound winding are the filament. If you do not know wha...morzh — 09:03 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I recently acquired a Philco Model 16 Code 126. I removed the power transformer to place heat shrink on some very bad...bobclausen — 08:23 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Hello Bob, That battery looks great nice job ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 08:20 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Yes, I plan to put a Velcro closer on the top.klondike98 — 07:28 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>