Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K
#2

In this comparison i would choose the Philco.

My 38-116 never was a player but I have had a nice 37-116 a 116X AND I still have the 680X here that were all nice players. The tuner on the 37 and 38 deluxe dials is a joy to tune as long as the small ball bearings are not flat spotted. My 15K was a nice sounding receptive set but I always seemed to have maintenance issues with it. It did have that Magic Voice gismo with metal tone pipes in the speaker chamber but mine was missing the original back so I could not hear the full effects. I used to listen to my 37-116 all night long in my bedroom in Florida and it never let me down with an issue.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 04:19 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by y2kbruce - 03-13-2013, 04:47 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 05:04 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 03-13-2013, 07:37 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 10:55 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-13-2013, 11:36 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by OldJack1969 - 10-10-2014, 07:04 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by jontz - 03-14-2013, 07:14 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-14-2013, 06:08 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by jontz - 03-14-2013, 09:28 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 03-14-2013, 09:41 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-14-2013, 09:51 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-14-2013, 10:58 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-15-2013, 10:20 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by TA Forbes - 03-15-2013, 07:24 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 10-10-2014, 09:27 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by thirtiesradio - 12-12-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 12-13-2014, 02:10 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Phlogiston - 12-13-2014, 09:07 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by thirtiesradio - 12-14-2014, 02:26 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5247 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5246 Guest(s)
Avatar

>