Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RCA 85T ??
#6

Jack

Make sure you DO know your 6A7 is good.
I had weird experience with them just a month ago (I needed to check the theory that my 6A7 was not oscillating properly below 6MHz, my FB band did not work there at all) where I bought an NOS tube from a guy (and he was an honest guy) and it tested about 600 instead of 1000, which is "?" territory. I was able to prove the theory (the oscillator worked as it should) but the tube was weak. That was #1.
Then I bought another NOS tube from another guy and it was near-dead, at 300. The guy admitted he did not test the tube as his tester does not test them, and sent me another RCA NOS one and that one was just fine (that's the one I keep in the radio). That was #2.
But before this guy had a chance to react I bought the third tube, also NOS and this time the guy claimed he tested it and it was like 150% or so (not sure what that means).
The tube came, and again, the pentode section was extremely weak. I suspect he tested only the oscillation section (in all three tubes it was indeed very strong).

So, out of four tubes and from three sellers only one was testing properly.
So make sure you buy from someone who tested it on a mutual conductance tester that tests both parts, the oscillator and the pentode, and both are close to new value or at least show strong "good". Ask the seller about how he tested them.
Or go to one of the sources folks here recommend (Bob Dobush at findatube.com).


Messages In This Thread
RCA 85T ?? - by jack_17 - 05-29-2013, 04:46 PM
RE: RCA 85T ?? - by TA Forbes - 05-29-2013, 06:53 PM
RE: RCA 85T ?? - by TA Forbes - 05-29-2013, 06:55 PM
RE: RCA 85T ?? - by morzh - 05-29-2013, 11:59 PM
RE: RCA 85T ?? - by jack_17 - 05-30-2013, 12:01 PM
RE: RCA 85T ?? - by morzh - 05-30-2013, 01:41 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>