Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1939 Packard Bell 48E
#2

I looked at the schematic, it's a nice set in that it has a pair of push-pull 6V6s but not a particularly elaborate one in terms of the front end. By the looks of things it's not much different then a typical 5 tube AC set, two IF cans, an oscillator adjustment, and an antenna adjustment for each band. According to the schematic the IF is 460, so nothing really unique there, likely you feed the test oscillator signal into the antenna through a .1 mf cap and adjust accordingly.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
1939 Packard Bell 48E - by RoyG - 08-08-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 10:29 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-09-2013, 10:33 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 11:35 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-15-2013, 09:26 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-15-2013, 09:47 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-15-2013, 10:49 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 12:20 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 02:15 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-16-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 09:09 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-16-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-16-2013, 11:56 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-17-2013, 12:12 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:36 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:54 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-18-2013, 02:31 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-18-2013, 11:39 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
I pulled the tube out and it's shorted from pin 1 to pin 2. I suppose that's the problem...sq65 — 08:12 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1166 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1165 Guest(s)
Avatar

>