Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Ohms readings on speaker output transformer
#4

Buzz

What sch tells you is probably indeed the resistance which is 140 Ohm. Yours is 49 Ohm. This is OK. In this case the sch does not rely on your DC primary resistance to set the working point.
You should worry about the total impedance of the primary, as Terry suggested. The impedance is a complex thing but in first approximation you could consider it to be your voice coil impedance reflected via the transformer which is simply multiplying it by the square of the turn ratio.
For example if your voice coil is 0.7 Ohm and your turn ratio is 100 then your reflected impedance is 0.7x10,000 which is 7kOhm.

Potentially (not necessarily in your case) the impedance mismatch may cause:

1. Loss of power (the impedance should be matched for the optimal transfer of power from the tube to the voice coil, this is in fact why we use the output transformers - to match impedance).
2. If the impedance is badly out of range the working zone of the tube may slide to the non-linear zone, hence distortion. Again, may or may not. There is range where the device is linear and it is not that narrow that a step left or right results in distortion.
3. And of course, there are inductive part that coupled with other elements (parasitics or intentionally used capacitances etc, plus the output impedance of the tube) affects the gain on various frequencies, so you may have less of some and more of some others. This is in small radios is not that important as the quality of the sound in the first place is not, well, exactly Hi-Fi, plus it can be corrected somewhat with tone control.

the easiest thing is first to look at your audio signal quality using an audio gen and a scope (or simply look at the received sound with the scope - see if it is distorted - clipped, clipped unevenly, etc), and see where (at what stage) it gets the distortion.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Ohms readings on speaker output transformer - by morzh - 10-21-2013, 04:05 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim, nice write up and thanks for sharing !! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:47 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, this was a real "Hum-Dinger" :lol: ! This will be kinda long, but hopefully it will help others having t...TV MAN — 01:55 AM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>