Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

emerson 557 ?
#5

As I remember selenium bridge rectifiers, the "+" sign was in fact at the positive output. They used the wrong symbol for it, but the "+" sign is at the right place, which in case of the selenium element would be at the Cathode (negative). However a single diode, of course, installs with its triangle to the AC input and with its bar to the output. We just have to make sure we do understand the marking. If it is a regular today's diode there will be no "+" sign, but the Negative (the bar) will be marked with a bar and this is what connects to the load, and the unmarked end connects to the AC.


Messages In This Thread
emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-10-2013, 01:06 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 12-10-2013, 05:08 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-10-2013, 06:58 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 12-10-2013, 08:46 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 12-10-2013, 10:12 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-11-2013, 10:28 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 12-11-2013, 12:36 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-11-2013, 05:04 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 12-11-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 03:52 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-08-2014, 04:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 01-08-2014, 07:41 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 07:59 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-08-2014, 08:17 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 08:44 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 01-08-2014, 09:29 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-09-2014, 06:31 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by hsusmann - 01-09-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-09-2014, 07:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-09-2014, 08:25 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-09-2014, 09:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-10-2014, 03:55 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-10-2014, 05:40 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-10-2014, 07:54 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-10-2014, 09:55 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-11-2014, 10:21 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-11-2014, 02:38 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-11-2014, 07:23 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-11-2014, 07:56 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-12-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 02-11-2014, 05:54 PM



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3906 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3905 Guest(s)
Avatar

>