Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

emerson 557 ?
#23

Eric, it would be nice to know where your at now. You have static only which you can vary the noise level with the volume control?
What test equipment do you have? A signal generator or a scope or a signal tracer? It would help to check where your RF is being lost.
I suspect if you have static that varies in volume when you increase the volume pot, your audio section is just fine as is your power supply.
You could certainly have problems in the IF section with perhaps SMD or open coils. The only way to tell is to use a signal generator or signal tracer and find out exactly where you are loosing that nice sound. Once you locate where you loosing it, you can address the problem.
Resistance measurements of the coils in the RF, Oscillator and antenna sections would also help.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.


Messages In This Thread
emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-10-2013, 01:06 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 12-10-2013, 05:08 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-10-2013, 06:58 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 12-10-2013, 08:46 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 12-10-2013, 10:12 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-11-2013, 10:28 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 12-11-2013, 12:36 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 12-11-2013, 05:04 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 12-11-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 03:52 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-08-2014, 04:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 01-08-2014, 07:41 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 07:59 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-08-2014, 08:17 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-08-2014, 08:44 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by BrendaAnnD - 01-08-2014, 09:29 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-09-2014, 06:31 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by hsusmann - 01-09-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-09-2014, 07:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-09-2014, 08:25 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by morzh - 01-09-2014, 09:30 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-10-2014, 03:55 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-10-2014, 05:40 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-10-2014, 07:54 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-10-2014, 09:55 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-11-2014, 10:21 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-11-2014, 02:38 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-11-2014, 07:23 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by jerryhawthorne - 01-11-2014, 07:56 PM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 01-12-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: emerson 557 ? - by Eric - 02-11-2014, 05:54 PM



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>