Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The vacuum tube tester
#3

The prices for tube testers on eBay are getting stupid.

1. If you have little experience working on electronic devices OR do not have other test equipment to use to troubleshoot/calibrate a tester, I strongly recommend you get a good working tester. Cost will be more....

2. If you can afford it, and considering the above, have someone fix/replace components/calibrate your new tester.

3. First choice should be a tester that measures the mutual conductance of a tube. Emissions testers do not give an accurate measurement of the tube. Also get a tester that will test shorts and gas. In my "opinion" the I-177 is, or should be, the most affordable of this variety. The Precise 111 WAS a good, affordable choice, but people are catching on to how good a tester they are.

4. Second choice would be a "dynamic conductance" tester like the Eico 666 or 667. They combine emission and mutual conductance to give a "dynamic" result. The Eico instruments are easy to work on, easy to calibrate, and give a FAIRLY reliable result. They do test for shorts, BUT do not offer a gas test. ALSO you must ensure that you get the updated tube settings that are online, as the Eico tester roll charts have errors.


Messages In This Thread
The vacuum tube tester - by fields 100 - 01-15-2014, 10:44 AM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by hsusmann - 01-15-2014, 11:13 AM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by TA Forbes - 01-15-2014, 11:41 AM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by morzh - 01-15-2014, 12:03 PM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by hsusmann - 01-15-2014, 01:19 PM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by morzh - 01-15-2014, 02:35 PM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by Bradley Rush - 01-15-2014, 03:14 PM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by TA Forbes - 01-16-2014, 10:50 AM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by Jamie - 01-17-2014, 08:23 PM
RE: The vacuum tube tester - by TA Forbes - 01-17-2014, 10:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Zenith H725
David - I think I understand but what units are you discussing (Low of 1.7, high of 3.9)? Budget constraints for Ham ...EdHolland — 01:43 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
You're doing great. I wish I could be more involved, but my mind is right now preoccupied with the reason I am here in ...morzh — 12:21 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hope you guys are still with me. I have moved on to the alignment. I completed the IF alignment which was pretty muc...dconant — 10:47 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hello MrFixr55, Thank you for taking the time to explain. I measured 50 volts where you say. Today the 370 volts at ...dconant — 12:51 PM
462ron
Oh that sucks. It’s something easily overlooked. Hopefully it’s nothing more than a resistor! Ron462ron — 08:08 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Just confirmed that you are correct. It’s the function generator. I connected the signal output probe to one of the inpu...jrblasde — 07:52 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Ouch, you may be right. Yes, it is solid state. It’s the signal output of my oscilloscope. May be time to crack that ...jrblasde — 07:27 AM
462ron
If you didn’t put a DC blocking cap between the signal generator probe and the plate of the 1st IF it’s possible you ble...462ron — 07:07 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConnant, The reason why C127 is isolated from ground is because sets of this vintage did not have the center tap...MrFixr55 — 01:07 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
The shield is on the 6H6. It was, in fact, a missing jumper to connect the main chassis ground to the RF chassis grou...jrblasde — 10:58 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1033 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 1031 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>