Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 89 bakelite block clarification
#1

Since my model 89 has the K-21 speaker, but still has the #36 tube, I've determined my set is somewhere between schematics #6, #7, and #8 in the http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/89evol.htm section. My question concerns the change made between November 15, 1933: Code 123, Run 7 and December 1, 1933: Code 123, Run 9 :

"Condenser 3615-L, .05 uF, formerly in parallel with .09 uF section of condenser ( 8 ), removed. Condenser (5), 4989-AG (.09 uF with 300 ohm resistor) removed. Above three parts replaced by condenser 4989-H (twin .09 uF) and flexible resistor 33-3010 (300 ohms) added from cathode of RF socket and ground."

My # 44 RF tube has what looks like a little cloth covered worm between the cathode to ground. I'm assuming that is the flexible resistor 33-3010 (300 ohms) mentioned above? Mine reads open so I can't verify the value.

Code 123, Run 7 looks like this:
   

And Code 123, Run 9 looks like this:
   

For the bakelite block shown as #5 in Run 7, and as 5 and 5a in Run 9, if I'm reading that right, having that little cloth covered flexible resistor replaces having a 300 ohm resistor and the .09 mfd capacitor inside the bakelite block? In other words, should there just be a .09 mfd cap in the block, and that separate 300 ohm resistor outside the block, mounted from the cathode of the #44 tube to ground?

My theory for this is the separate designation on the bakelite block on Run 7 of the . 09 mfd cap & 300 ohm resistor as being just #5, and on Run 9 it became #5 for the cap, and #5a for the resistor.

Any thoughts, ideas, whacks along side the head would be most helpful Icon_smile

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org


Messages In This Thread
Model 89 bakelite block clarification - by NostalgiaRadioTime - 02-16-2014, 02:10 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Well guys I am stuck, frustrated and about ready to give up. For starters all I'm getting from the speaker is a humming ...osanders0311 — 02:17 PM
[split] New member...
Thanks.  I'll try that.HowardWoodard — 01:13 PM
[split] New member...
You may have to start further back with your signal injection at the IF signal grid, then tune the second IF transformer...RodB — 10:28 AM
[split] New member...
Well, with the replacement tuning assembly, I have finally put the unit back together and aligned the dial.  The first s...HowardWoodard — 01:01 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Well, finding a short is easy. Like I said, disconnect the transformer's secondary windings and see if it persists. If...morzh — 09:48 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Nice one!Stan the Man — 09:37 PM
Restoring Philco 96
I have eventually replaced the speaker and shot the video, which only shows the upper part of the dial as the hum is ver...morzh — 09:24 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Kinda weird to see both open Nothing weird if you remember that this radio is about 100 years old  :)Vlad95 — 07:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
I believe I'm making progress, resistors have been rechecked and corrected, removed that ugly blue capacitor and more wi...osanders0311 — 07:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh Yes I recapped everything and replaced almost all the resistors as well. I redid #99 with .015 safety ca...bobclausen — 07:11 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1293 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1292 Guest(s)
Avatar

>