Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 38-690 tweeter improvement
#18

Ron Ramirez Wrote:If you compare the schematics of the 37-690 and 38-690, you will see that the tweeters are driven by the output tubes in the 37-690, as is the woofer. This is the reason the tweeters are so loud in the 37 model. (Too loud, in my opinion; even taking the NRSC pre-emphasis curve into consideration.

The whole problem lies in the size of the "tweeters". I agree with you on the upper limit frequency of around 10Khz. I think the Philco engineerz designed this model to be "impressive" hence the illogical size of the tweeters (one would have be sufficient AFAIK). 4" tweeters would offer a better frequency response and also be a better match to the woofer. In such a design, the engineer should have taken into account the response curve and sound pressure of the woofer then match the tweeters with a simple resistor/capacitor network, something they obviously didn't do.

Interesting that Philco adopted such a complicated solution in adding a special winding to the driver transformer instead of adding a simple resistor/cap network to the tweeters and keeping them in parallel with the woofer. I guess they were radio engineers, not audio engineers...

By looking at the schematic, a 6F6 used as a driver (equivalent to an SE amp) I figured 1-2Watts to be enough to drive both tweeters. I guessed wrong apparently. My suggestion in this case would be to add a small value power resistor (say 4ohms) in series with a 4uF cap. The whole in parallel with the _woofer_. This should do it. Idea is to match the total db level of "tweeters vs the woofer".

I would also add a small "whizzer" to the tweeters. Yeah I know, it's hot-rodding, but it is reversible and will definitely enhance the upper frequencies. I did it with my top of the line Nothern console's 12 inches -in a ported enclosure mind you- and it did a very noticeable difference (I had to recone the woofer too so it wasn't complicated to do). I have plenty of whizzers on hand so this was an easy fix, still it is pretty simple to make one using cardstock. Definitely worth it.

Just a thought.

Syl


Messages In This Thread
Re: Philco 38-690 tweeter improvement - by Syl - 07-25-2008, 11:16 AM
Re: Philco 38-690 tweeter improvement - by Syl - 07-25-2008, 09:19 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-25-2008, 10:39 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-25-2008, 10:52 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-25-2008, 11:49 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-25-2008, 11:53 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-26-2008, 12:06 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-26-2008, 12:06 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-26-2008, 12:13 AM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-26-2008, 12:59 AM
[No subject] - by BDM - 07-26-2008, 01:40 AM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-26-2008, 01:48 AM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-26-2008, 02:30 AM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-26-2008, 09:33 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-26-2008, 10:20 AM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-26-2008, 12:52 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-26-2008, 04:33 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-26-2008, 04:47 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-26-2008, 04:53 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-26-2008, 05:40 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-26-2008, 05:51 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-26-2008, 05:55 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-26-2008, 06:50 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-26-2008, 08:17 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-26-2008, 10:26 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-27-2008, 12:11 AM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-27-2008, 02:02 PM
[No subject] - by Terry Judkins - 07-27-2008, 06:59 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-27-2008, 07:11 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-27-2008, 07:53 PM
[No subject] - by wonderwrench - 07-27-2008, 10:00 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-28-2008, 11:21 AM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-28-2008, 06:10 PM
[No subject] - by BDM - 07-28-2008, 06:17 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 07-28-2008, 06:59 PM
[No subject] - by Dave Slusarczyk - 07-28-2008, 07:12 PM
[No subject] - by Syl - 07-28-2008, 09:33 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5930 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 5927 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>