Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

116B vs 650B
#12

You'll find that the sets sold by department stores from mail order will need to be good performers. They were bought by residents of outlying areas where reception was hard to pull in. Exactly who had made the sets that Tex tells about above is unknown at this point. Sears had their own radio manufacturing plant, but for how long, I don't know now. It was Colonial Radio, and they built a lot of SRCo sets. There were RCA sets with the Silvertone name as well as even some Wells-Gardner, who supplied a lot of Montgomery Ward models. I have one of the W-G 16 tube Airline sets, and I expect that it will be hard to beat for reception.

It would be interesting to make the detector output measurement on those little fellers that Tex describes, and see how they stack up against other similar sets.

One of the well-known RCA sets from 1946 is the 56X5. It's an AA5+1 set, and purportedly a "12,000 miler" (if I have my mileage right). It isn't bad on AM Broadcast, and must have an external antenna for SW reception. But RCA fan that I am, I fail to see the basis for claim to any fabulous distant reception. You'd expect the SW band to be abuzz with stations, and it's anything but that. The 12000 miles could mean that one of those sets was carried on an airliner trip of 12,000 miles.


Messages In This Thread
116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-20-2008, 09:53 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-21-2008, 08:59 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-21-2008, 09:35 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 10:31 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-26-2008, 11:46 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 11:51 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Ron Ramirez - 10-27-2008, 10:06 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 10:10 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 10-27-2008, 04:45 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 08:55 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Texasrocker - 10-30-2008, 03:14 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 11-01-2008, 10:32 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by MinnesotaHam - 12-01-2008, 10:14 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 12-05-2008, 10:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Just forget this number, it is useless anyway. Simply proceed with your project.morzh — 10:08 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
My $0.02 is that it is a misprint. I tried to look up the value for the similar 84 and 37-84, and ther is no resistance...MrFixr55 — 09:51 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Thanks for the quick reply! Hmm...well that's good, so what am I seeing that's 1042 ohms on the schematic for the pow...Mike L — 08:46 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
The DC resistance of the primary is 8 to 9 Ohm.morzh — 07:54 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
I have a feeling the primary winding on the power transformer is bad. My resistance reading on the primary side is 9 ohm...Mike L — 07:48 PM
Rusty Tuning Condenser
I would try Naval Jelly and use a soaked pipe cleaner to get it where it needs to go.RossH — 06:56 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Hello Dconant , they sold mica to use as a insulator between transistors and their heatsinks too. Rob I will remove th...radiorich — 02:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Thanks for the info guys. I always wondered why the use of mica. Now I know.dconant — 01:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Most common plastics have a dielectric constant in the 3-4 range whereas mica is around 6. This means that even if you w...Steve D — 01:46 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
It is acceptable but not desirable. Plastic is not an approved cap dielectric, and even though a reasonably thick piece...morzh — 11:52 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>