Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

116B vs 650B
#1

I did a little comparison tonight with these sets. Side by side using the same antenna. I'd switch between the two. Making a long story short, here's the results. More useless info to come latter on Icon_mrgreen

Ok, the 116 without any doubt, has an edge on the high & low SW bands. It's about the same in the MW/PB band. Also, it seems to have a slight edge in the lower portion of the BCB, say below 800/kc. Not much, but there's a detectable difference. About the same on the LW band.

Now, both sets have been operating for about 1 1/2 hours. They're good and warm. I touched up the IF Ant & RF alignments on the 650 just to be sure. I re-checked the alignment on the 116, and it's still at it's max. Both sets are running full tilt. The 116 does have an overall edge in sensitivity. It seems to shine more in the SW bands. I imaging that's where Philco targeted this set. I couldn't detect any difference in selectivity.

Keep in mind. All caps & lytics have been replaced. I've gone through most of the important resistors to make sure they're in spec. I still have a few more to check on the 116. Also, both sets are just about spot on with tube voltages. So they're the best they can be as they sit right now.

Bottom line, both sets are hot performers as consumer sets go. No complaints on either of them. Just a little something I'd thought I'd share with you.

Here's the 116 vid for those who haven't seen it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3jPTl7VvVc

-Brian
If you collect or are interested in antique telephones, please visit Classic Rotary Phones
http://www.classicrotaryphones.com/forum/index.php


Messages In This Thread
116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-20-2008, 09:53 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-21-2008, 08:59 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-21-2008, 09:35 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 10:31 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-26-2008, 11:46 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 11:51 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Ron Ramirez - 10-27-2008, 10:06 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 10:10 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 10-27-2008, 04:45 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 08:55 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Texasrocker - 10-30-2008, 03:14 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 11-01-2008, 10:32 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by MinnesotaHam - 12-01-2008, 10:14 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 12-05-2008, 10:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Just forget this number, it is useless anyway. Simply proceed with your project.morzh — 10:08 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
My $0.02 is that it is a misprint. I tried to look up the value for the similar 84 and 37-84, and ther is no resistance...MrFixr55 — 09:51 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
Thanks for the quick reply! Hmm...well that's good, so what am I seeing that's 1042 ohms on the schematic for the pow...Mike L — 08:46 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
The DC resistance of the primary is 8 to 9 Ohm.morzh — 07:54 PM
Philco Model 80 Transformer resistance
I have a feeling the primary winding on the power transformer is bad. My resistance reading on the primary side is 9 ohm...Mike L — 07:48 PM
Rusty Tuning Condenser
I would try Naval Jelly and use a soaked pipe cleaner to get it where it needs to go.RossH — 06:56 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Hello Dconant , they sold mica to use as a insulator between transistors and their heatsinks too. Rob I will remove th...radiorich — 02:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Thanks for the info guys. I always wondered why the use of mica. Now I know.dconant — 01:52 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
Most common plastics have a dielectric constant in the 3-4 range whereas mica is around 6. This means that even if you w...Steve D — 01:46 PM
38-10T chassis Restoration begins
It is acceptable but not desirable. Plastic is not an approved cap dielectric, and even though a reasonably thick piece...morzh — 11:52 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>