Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 90 vs 650B
#6

Quote:The better selectivity on the Model 90 is due to the lower I.F. freq of 175 kHz., as opposed to the 460 kHz. on the 650.

Yes, I hadn't thought about that, Chuck. But , if all other factors were equal, than the 175kc I.F. ought to be a little better than 2.5 times more narrow.

Quote:Also consider the fact that the Model 90 has Philco's "double tuned input curcuit"; i.e. two tuned circuits ahead of the RF amplifier tube, which is designed to provide sharper selectivity.

Ron, yes I am still very impressed by this fact. That four gang tuner with the double tuned antenna coil was quite an advanced circuit for its day. Philco spared no expense on that. Icon_smile

I have to say that I'm still very surprised by the performance of the model 90. I guess the use of those #24 screen grid tubes made quite a difference. After all, it is quite advanced for a 1932 set.

Ed


Messages In This Thread
Philco 90 vs 650B - by etech - 10-23-2008, 11:45 AM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by Chuck Schwark - 10-23-2008, 12:05 PM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by etech - 10-23-2008, 02:59 PM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by Chuck Schwark - 10-23-2008, 03:36 PM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by Ron Ramirez - 10-23-2008, 05:06 PM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by etech - 10-23-2008, 05:16 PM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by BDM - 10-24-2008, 10:20 AM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by Chuck Schwark - 10-24-2008, 11:13 AM
Re: Philco 90 vs 650B - by BDM - 10-24-2008, 11:49 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)