Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

116B vs 650B
#9

A more accurate test of the set's performance would be to measure the AGC voltage coming off of the detector of each set, receiving the same station with the same antenna. The AGC action of the set masks the true gain of it, but the output of the detector tells how much gain the set had before the detector. I'm sure that the 116 has lots more gain than the 650, but the AGC in it pulls back more on the reins, and that causes the 116 to appear to have the same gain.

Get a VTVM, and connect it to the detector outputs in as nearly the same on each set, then see what it says. There should be a difference.

This is why you need an indicator of receiver output when you align it. The audio output of a radio is no accurate indicator of resonance when you are peaking the alignment. True, it was the way you indicated before the late thirties, but VTVM's were almost unknown much before the forties. It's even possible with a 20,000 ohm per volt meter to measure the detector's output. On a 20 volt scale for instance, the resistive load of the meter would be 400,000 ohms, and the detector could survive with that easily. If you look at the circuits of the old Hammarlund communication sets, the "S" meter is actually a straight voltmeter across the detector output.


Messages In This Thread
116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-20-2008, 09:53 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-21-2008, 08:59 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-21-2008, 09:35 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 10:31 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-26-2008, 11:46 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 11:51 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Ron Ramirez - 10-27-2008, 10:06 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 10:10 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 10-27-2008, 04:45 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 08:55 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Texasrocker - 10-30-2008, 03:14 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 11-01-2008, 10:32 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by MinnesotaHam - 12-01-2008, 10:14 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 12-05-2008, 10:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Refinishing Ideas
Hi Poulsbobl, I think that you could get away with it.  In the Philco Library, there is a parts listand specs for sp...MrFixr55 — 11:54 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
The sleeving for the transformer arrived early, so I went ahead and finished reassembling. The chassis looks far better ...jrblasde — 10:15 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
I don't know what you are referring to when you say "tube cathode ground". Ground is a connection to the chass...RodB — 05:56 PM
Zenith H725
Good points, Arran. I haven't encountered this problem with any other radio (all earlier vintages), so am learning here....EdHolland — 05:32 PM
Zenith H725
Ed; One thing that I will say about these is that Brand Z was considerate enough to make these mica caps easily acces...Arran — 02:34 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Do you know what run # your chassis is? It took me a while to find what you were basing updates/modification on as I did...Radioroslyn — 07:34 AM
Need to purchase some accessories for restoration of my Old Philco Radio
COLLEAGUES, Thank you all for such good and important suggestions as how to find good replacement parts. I will go fo...palonso — 07:05 AM
Zenith H725
Here's what the inside of AM IFT2 looked like, and the other pic shows the discs I made to take place of the mica and ke...EdHolland — 07:40 PM
Zenith H725
IF2 will need replacement caps. The arcing was severe enough that the mica is pitted and holed where the HT flashed over...EdHolland — 04:04 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Measuring from center tap like the tube voltages show. Cap 127 is isolated from ground. Cap 127 shown in upper left of p...dconant — 08:05 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 789 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 788 Guest(s)
Avatar

>