Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Next case - Odd Philco 42-720 Tropic
#41

Ron;
  It looks like Philco punched a hole in the chassis where wires would normally come out the other side of the transformer, but then they decided to block the hole with something. With regard to mounting, that is a tricky issue, the first one I linked to is the Edcore XPWR008, the width at the bell ends is 3.22'', the space between mounting holes on the ears of each bell is 2.5'', the maximum length from the outside of one bell to the next is 4.189''. The distance between the mounting holes from one bell to the next is 2.955'', I'm not sure whether that is between centers or the maximum or minimum as they look elongated or slotted, I think it may be minimum as the holes for the leads are exactly 3'' from center to center. 
  For the Edcor XPWR014, the end bells are the same as the XPWR008, with the mounting holes at 2.5'' on center. The maximum length of the transformer is 3.435'' so more then 1/2'' shorter, and the slots are marked as 2.201'', which I think is a minimum measurement given that the holes for the wires are 2.246'' on center. For the Edcor XPWR049, the one with the 6 amp rectifier winding, the dimensions are the same as the XPWR008. It looks like any way you go there is going to be some drilling and tapping involved. 
   Since most of the transformers looked at have a H.V winding that exceeds the original in current capacity, except that the net high voltage will likely be higher then the ratings posted, except for the Edcor XPW014 which has it's rated at 75 ma. What I would like to see are more reproduction power transformers with a horizontal mounting, that style was popular with many radio manufacturers.
Regards
Arran

  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Next case - Odd Philco 42-720 Tropic - by sam - 10-30-2014, 03:55 AM
RE: Next case - Odd Philco 42-720 Tropic - by Arran - 11-04-2014, 04:50 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Hi Morzh, May be a good idea to remove the cone to prevent damage. You may have to do so anyway to remove the pole ...MrFixr55 — 08:44 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I think that Danaher, the company that owns Beckman-Coulter (the company that I worked for 41 years) owns Fluke. They a...MrFixr55 — 08:35 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Rod I wish... :lol: I am not sure I'd buy the Fluke, had it not fell in my lap for free. $500 to $800...it's a lot...morzh — 08:09 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Mike, ...you get a commission?RodB — 07:52 PM
New member
Hi. I specialize in refurbishing Predictas, but I'm in Chicago. If you can get it to me, I'd be happy to go over it. ...Bob Andersen — 06:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I have 3 G speaker, all with open Field coils. Today I pull one of the shelf and decided to try to remove the FC (spo...morzh — 06:07 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Thanks Mike. I will check them out.dconant — 05:52 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
There is no such thing as bad Fluke. This said, they are expensive. A Fluke is easily 10x the price of comparable CCC...morzh — 05:45 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Hello Mike, Yes, I have 3 Fluke meters one being my first Fluke 77 and other being Fluke 87. My third is Fluke clamp -...radiorich — 05:04 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I knew that Fluke was the Cadillac so with that in mind what Fluke would you recommend I get?dconant — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3290 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 3287 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>