Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#11

Mike;
  I see, so the model 62 that Kirk has is the second series, which is somewhere between the first series model 62, and the third series Model 62, for which they didn't bother posting an actual schematic but posted that note on the third series schematic instead about the 1 uf and 2 uf paper caps in the tin box. I seem to remember that we may have discussed this before, maybe after Kirk fist got the radio and attempted to work on it. Why they could not have given each set a different model number defies logic, or even just a suffix like Model 62-B, or 62-C to avoid confusion? At least the successor company Packard Bell did this, there was a 46A and a 46B for example, maybe Herb Bell learned his lesson? 
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 09:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 11:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 01:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 02:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 06:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 06:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 11:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 01:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 09:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 09:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 09:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 11:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 09:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 01:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-04-2015, 12:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 12:41 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 02:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 03:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 05:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 07:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 09:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 03:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 10:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 04:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 08:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 01:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 02:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 11:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-09-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 07:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 08:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 09:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 02:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 11:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 02:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>